Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Successful execution of this project requires critical thinking at a high level. Justification, explanation, discussion, reasoning, and examples all combine to create a synthesis of intellect and opinion. Tailored as a take-home midterm exam, you have one week (7 days) within which to complete and submit your work.
The following hypothetical scenario sets the stage:
You represent a well-established branded international hotel company with corporate headquarters in the U.S.A. After careful consideration, you have narrowed possible choices for your next venture down to two possible locations – each with its own set of challenges and rewards — you must now choose one of the following two cities within which to build your new hotel – a 500-room, full service, luxury, city-center hotel and strategically justify your choice according to the trend criteria set forth below. Here
are the locations:
- Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
The hotel will have the following attributes:
- Two full-service branded Haute Cuisine restaurants
- Multiple bar locations – lobby, restaurant, pool
- Full executive committee with full staff commensurate with a property of this type.
- Full amenities including fitness center, pool, game room, etc.
- Meeting space for conferences and meetings consistent with property of this size.
- Complimentary airport shuttle service.
- There will be NO SPA (this is not a resort or boutique property).
This exercise requires critical thinking, – thinking outside of the box and coloring outside of the lines will serve you well – specifically, application and mastery of all five of the IBCT Commitments1 is required and essential.
(1) You must: clearly formulate questions identifying and addressing potential problems and/or predicaments inherent to both locations; (2) gather and assess relevant data based on the trend criteria set forth below both as it currently exists but and its expected impact going forward including any ramifications; (3) identify, choose and consider possible alternative criteria and state their potential implications (without
1 http://www.usfsm.edu/academics/institutional-research-and-effectiveness/incredibull-critical- thinking/index.aspx The following is taken from the USFSM website – link supra: USFSM’s IncrediBull Critical Thinking is a university-wide endeavor to enhance undergraduate students’ critical thinking skills. Critical thinking is one of USFSM’s six Pillars of Intellectual Engagement. After consulting with faculty, staff, students and others in the community, and analyzing student learning assessment data, critical thinking emerged as the topic with the greatest potential to support the institution’s mission to prepare its students to be “successful leaders and responsible citizens.” USFSM chose critical thinking as its Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) topic for reaffirmation of accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). For reaffirmation by SACSCOC, USFSM must develop a new QEP every ten years. A QEP’s purpose is to designate a strategy to increase students’ learning outcomes in an area deemed central to the university’s mission. Students were integrally involved in developing our QEP’s name—Incredi-Bull Critical Thinking (IBCT).
Definition of Critical Thinking:
Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, . . . reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action.
— From a statement by Michael Scriven & Richard Paul, presented at the 8th Annual International Conference on Critical Thinking and Education Reform, Summer 1987.
The Five Commitments that comprise IBCT outcomes:
- Formulate vital questions and problems clearly.
- Gather and assess relevant information.
- Identify relevant assumptions, alternatives, and implications.
- Develop well-reasoned conclusions and solutions.
- Communicate reasoning effectively.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (7th ed.). Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
The Intellectual Standards that define the quality of thinking:
Clear – Understandable; meaning can be grasped
Accurate – Free from errors or distortions; true
Precise – Exact to the necessary level of detail
Relevant – Relates to the matter at hand
Deep – Explains complexities and provides insight
Broad – Encompasses multiple viewpoints and is comprehensive
Logical – Parts of thinking make sense together; no contradictions
Significant – Focuses on the important; not trivial Fair – Justifiable; not self-serving or one-sided
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools (7th ed.).
Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
2 Strategic Management for Hospitality & Travel: Today and Tomorrow
omitting any mandatory criteria); (4) develop well-reasoned conclusions as you synthesize your data and justify your choice by comparing/contrasting the application of the trends as they apply to both locations, using logic, explanation, and examples to bolster your argument/choice; and (5) effectively communicate reasoning and rationale to your audience.
You will conduct a thorough remote environmental scan in order to assess the suitability for your new venture – conduct an expanded PESTEL Analysis as well as a SWOT analysis using the information contained infra. Once all of your data has been collected and organized, you will weigh the pros and cons of both locations. Persuasive advocacy must be employed as you discuss your selections, applying the data to your arguments.
Your analysis must include, but not be limited to, the following factors (trend criteria): Political:
- Corruption/Trust Administrative concerns
Fees, licenses, inspections
- Business Policy
- Banking
- Lobbying
- Diplomatic Presence (UN)
- Military (size, budget, scope)
- Local Financial Incentives Tax rebates
Cash offers (key money)
Discounts on fees/charges for city services (trash removal, etc.)
- Safety/Security Terrorism
Crime rate
- Immigration/Migration
Rate
Source
Demographics
Ecology:
- Sustainability Current practice
Mindset going forward
- Natural Resources/Energy Water Gas
Take-Home Midterm Exam
Oil
Electricity
Socio-Cultural:
- Health Care
Availability
Level
Pharmaceuticals
- Demographics
- Local Mores/Worldview
- Public Perception
- Quality of Life
- Religion
Importance and impact on daily life
- Nationalism
- Social Stability Education
Availability
Level
Technology:
- Level of Advancement
- Skill Set of Population
- Integration/Acceptance in Business
- Freedom of Choice Social media
Censorship
Government control
- Availability Internet
Hardware
Software
Economy:
- GDP
- Cycle
Position since last downturn
- Trade Agreements
- Exports/Imports
- Unemployment Rate
4 Strategic Management for Hospitality & Travel: Today and Tomorrow
Laws:
- Regulations
- Judicial Structure
- Employment/Labor Law Minimum wage
Discrimination/harassment
- Environmental Law
Specific regulations
- Land Use/Zoning
You are free to add to this list but you must not take away or substitute anything in its place.
You must consider both the current state of affairs and any predictions you find – your hotel will hopefully exist for many years – but these trends are certain to change over time – and change will lead to consequences – some good, some not so good.
Your paper must be formatted as follows:
- Cover Page
- Reference Page
- Minimum 2500 words – not including cover or reference pages
- All sources must be cited using APA citation
- Any quotes must be cited
- Please do not include lengthy quotes or random data without justification and explanation as to why you are mentioning it
- Do not include any sources in the reference page that have not been specifically cited in the body of the paper
- Please use 1.5˝ spacing and number your pages (not cover page)
- No maximum number of words – but please, no more than 20 pages total
- Please upload to BeachBoard as a Microsoft Word or PDF Document
- You have Seven (7) full days to submit your exam – please make the best use of your time
Written by: Keith A. Barron, Esq.
University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee Take-Home Midterm Exam
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!