History of Logarithms Math Essay Assignment Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
History of Logarithms Math Essay Assignment Paper
The Task:
You will need to choose one of the following roles in order to complete the assignment. Each role focuses on different aspects of logarithms, and each role has different requirements for presenting your work. Read the requirements carefully and choose the role that best suits your interests.
Question 1
The Engineer: As an engineer, you will focus on finding information about how logarithms were used to solve problems at the time it was invented. Also, consider how similar problems were solved before logarithms were created. Consider:
What tools were needed to complete calculations before the invention of logarithms?
What tools were used, or needed, after logarithms were created?
How do we use logarithms today that differs from the way they were used when they were invented?
How do you use the tools of logarithms to solve problems?
If you choose the role of an engineer, you will need to submit a written report (1-3 pages double spaced). Your report should include:
A brief introduction.
A body that includes the information outlined above, pictures, examples, etc.
A conclusion.
Any additional documents that may relate to the report, including sources (at least 2) cited in APA style.
Question 2
The Teacher: As a teacher, you will need to think about how you would teach these concepts to others. Think about areas that might be difficult for students, how will you teach it so that students can understand? Think about creative and interesting ways that you can teach and engage student interest.
If you choose the role of a teacher, you will need to submit a presentation (either Powerpoint or Prezi – maximum 20 slides). Your presentation should include:
An interesting introduction (A “hook”)
A brief description of who invented logarithms, why they were invented, when it was invented, how they invented it, etc. c) A lesson on how to use logarithms. This may include, but is not limited to, a video, an interactive, an activity, etc.
A conclusion that wraps up and restates any important ideas that were taught in the lesson.
In-text/media citation, and a references page (at least two sources).
Question 3
The Historian: As a historian you will focus on finding information relating to the history of logarithms. You will need to consider the “5 W’s and How”:
Who invented logarithms?
When was it invented?
Why did they invent it?
Where did they invent it?
How did they invent it?
Once you have answered these questions, also consider adding any other interesting information that relates to logarithms, or the inventor(s).
You may also want to consider other factors from the time period that may have had an influence on the invention of logarithms. For example, what changes were going on that might have required faster or more accurate mathematical calculations?
If you choose the role of the historian, you will need to submit a formal essay (1 – 4 pages double spaced, at least 2 sources). Your essay should include:
An introductory paragraph that clearly states the topic.
At least three body paragraphs.
A concluding paragraph that wraps up the ideas discussed.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!