HIMS655 Electronic Longitudinal Health Records
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
HIMS655 Electronic Longitudinal Health Records
Hi, please read and contribute to peer discussion in 100 words minimum with at least 2-3 credible references.
Peer 1:
The term womb to tomb, also known as the longitudinal health record, refers to the documentation of a patient’s health occurrences from birth to death as recorded by a health professional.
The purpose of a longitudinal health record is for the attending practitioner to be able to see a patient’s overall health state from start to finish without substantial gaps in data, giving them a holistic perspective.
In an ideal world, a lifetime’s worth of health data would be accessible and interoperable across the United States, regardless of context or location.Diagnostics, observations, test results, treatment plans, imaging data, and other relevant information gathered over a lifetime could potentially save lives. Patient demographics, progress notes, issues, prescriptions, vital signs, past medical history, vaccines, laboratory data, and radiological reports are all included in a patient’s longitudinal health record..
The longitudinal health record, streamlines and automates the workflow of the practitioner. It also can create a complete record of a clinical patient interaction, as well as supporting other care-related activities, such as evidence-based decision support, quality management, and outcomes, directly or indirectly via interface.
The following are the characteristics of a longitudinal health record:
Documentation from a variety of healthcare providers and encounters is included.
Saves patient data for a set amount of time, usually as long as the patient is receiving care.
Is dynamic, i.e., it changes over time as the patient’s needs alter (Oachs & Watters, 2020).
The healthcare business is increasingly requiring practitioners to access patient-recorded data that may be shared across several sites, documented in a variety of paper or digital formats, and delivered as a set of well-thought-out, integrated, and unambiguous entries. Longitudinal electronic patient records provide long-awaited answers to physicians’ requirements (Bassi, 2016).
References:
Bassi, Z. (2016, August). Longitudinal patient records: A re-examination. Retrieved from University of Wisconsin Milwaukee: https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=225…
Oachs, P., & Watters, A. (2020). The Longitudinal Health Record. In P. Oachs, & A. Watters, Health Information Management, Concepts, Principles, and Practice, 6th Edition (p. 105). American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA).
Peer 2:
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an electronic medical form consisting of patients’ health information, which is maintained in any medical delivery setting and is generated in more than one encounter (de Benedictis, 2020). The records contain critical administrative, clinical data such as progress notes, past medical history, vital signs, immunization, and laboratory data, which provide complete and accurate information enabling reliable prescribing.
Electronic health records are also referred to as womb to tomb records or longitudinal health records; this is because a patient’s health documentation events are recorded from birth to death time (“Development of the Electronic Health Record,” 2011). The major aim of the longitudinal health record is to make it easier for a medical provider to view the overall health status of a patient without any gap.
It is termed a longitudinal health record because it provides dependable, secure, and real-time access to patients’ health information specifically where needed; it captures and manages occasional information, resulting to risk and performance management supporting unceasing quality improvement and functions as the primary source of information. In surgical setting electrical health records have resulted to significant impact on quality medical records.
It is a longitudinal health record because it incorporates data from overtime and crosswise systems promoting progressive care across various health care networks through collaborative sharing of data since a medical history is available (Broyles et al., 2016). To be able to provide a more comprehensive and longitudinal representation of medical history, an electronic health record system combines health datasets from various sources.
With electronic health records, health information in a digital platform is created and managed by authorized providers and shared across more than one healthcare facility (Dutta & Hwang, 2020). This results to complete and legible documentation, privacy and security of a patient’s information, and, lastly, convenient healthcare services.
References
de Benedictis, A., Lettieri, E., Gastaldi, L., Masella, C., Urgu, A., & Tartaglini, D. (2020). Electronic Medical Records implementation in hospital: An empirical investigation of individual and organizational determinants. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0234108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234108
Broyles, D., Crichton, R., Jolliffe, B., Sæbø, J. I., & Dixon, B. E. (2016). Shared Longitudinal Health Records for Clinical and Population Health. Health Information Exchange, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-803135-3.00010-4
Dutta, B., & Hwang, H. G. (2020). The adoption of electronic medical record by physicians. Medicine, 99(8), e19290. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000019290
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!