HIMS 655 Designing and In Service Training Assignment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
HIMS 655 Designing and In Service Training Assignment
HIMS 655, Designing, Service, Training, Assignment
Peer 1:
According to the AHIMA Data Quality Model (DQM), the following aspects are considered critical in any training program focused on completeness and accuracy of health records. If I were to create a training program on the importance of data quality, I would emphasize these seven characteristics: (AHIMA, n.d.)
Data Accuracy: The level of assurance that the data is free of errors.
Data Consistency: The consistency of the healthcare data that is consistent across different applications.
- Data Relevancy: The degree to which the data is useful for the purposes that it was collected.
- Data Comprehensiveness: The extent to which the data collected is comprehensive and consistent across all applications.
- Data Currency: The extent to which the data is up-to-date. A datum value is updated if it is current for a specific date in time, and it is outdated if it is incorrect at a later time.
- Data Granularity: The concept of data quality is defined by the level of detail that is required to describe the characteristics of healthcare data.
- Data Timeliness: Up-to-date data is available for a specific time or date.
- In addition to covering the key characteristics of complete and accurate data noted above, I would cover the following management considerations that a HIM professional or department use to assess overall data quality
- Application: The purpose of collecting the data is understood and will answer key questions.
Collection: The process or collecting data is clearly understood and standardized.
Analysis: The way in which HIM translates data into meaning use is understood and valued.
- A study in 2020 on COVID-19 health records indicated that less attention was given to ICD-10 coding than the COVID-19 test results themselves. COVID-19 symptoms were higher in unstructured clinical data than in structure coded data (Binkheder, Asiri, Altowayan, Alshehri, Alzarie, Aldekhyyel, Almaghlouth, & Almulhem, 2021).
- References:
- AHIMA (n.d.). Data quality model. http://library.ahima.org/PB/DataQualityModel#.WL2U-hBWDi8
Binkheder, S., Asiri, M., Altowayan, K., Alshehri, T., Alzarie, M., Aldekhyyel, R., Almaghlouth, I., Almulhem, J. (2021). Real-World Evidence of COVID-19 Patients’ Data Quality in the Electronic Health Records. Healthcare, 9(1648), 1648. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.3390/healthcare9121648
Peer 2:
Its important to have completeness for health records sine the data should all be in one place and available for that information when necessary. Reduction of duplicate testing is important when referring to health records. If health records are unfinished physicians can order duplicate tests and this can be costly.
The cost of resources for the hospital is wasted and it effects the quality of care for patents as well. This can also occupy the patient’s time and lower the quality of care provided. If health records are deemed insufficient, they can be damaging to patients, implying that these records should be thoroughly reviewed.
When it comes to information and data, accuracy is understanding that there should be no mistakes. This is significant since it aids physicians and hospitals in reducing their chances of making errors of any kind. If the data is incorrectly shown, the physician is more likely to hurt the patient or perhaps make a mistake.
Medical blunders can be costly, causing patients money out of pocket or expending their insurance deductibles. Clinical documentation enhancement is the most effective technique to improve the accuracy and completeness of health records (CDI). This would be beneficial because this type of documentation can assist in the improvement of patient care. Clinical documentation improvement assists hospitals in reimbursements with coding.
Adane, K., Gizachew, M., & Kendie, S. (2019). The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: a review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, Volume 12, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s179259
AHIMA Work Group. (2013). Integrity of the Healthcare Record: Best Practices for EHR Documentation (2013 update). Journal of AHIMA, 84(8), 58–62 [extended web version]. https://library.ahima.org/doc?oid=300257#.YPpZ2ehKhPY
Hong, C. J., Kaur, M. N., Farrokhyar, F., & Thoma, A. (2015). Accuracy and completeness of electronic medical records obtained from referring physicians in a Hamilton, Ontario, plastic surgery practice: A prospective feasibility study. Plastic Surgery, 23(1), 48–50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4364140/#:~:text=They%20facilitate%20access%2C%20availability%20and
Rodenberg, H., Shay, L., Sheffield, K., & Dange, Y. (2019). The Expanding Role of Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs in Research and Analytics. Perspectives in Health Information Management, 16(Winter). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341414/
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!