HIMS 650 Week 5 Inferential Versus Descriptive Statistics
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
HIMS 650 Week 5 Inferential Versus Descriptive Statistics
respond should be in 100 words references minimum.
Peer # 1
Descriptive statistics summarizes data where inferential statistics evaluates whether the data is generalized to a broader population. In inferential data you can use presented data to draw a conclusion. “Inferential statistics are an extension of the natural human tendency toward inference and are powerful tools that can help answer questions such as how much, how many, or how often” (Pfleger & Kimmons, 1970)
Common inferential statistical methods are:
Hypothesis tests- Hypothesis testing is where an analyst tests an assumption regarding a population variable (Majaski, 2021).
Confidence intervals- probability that a population variable will fall betwix a set of values for a certain time (Hayes, 2021).
Regression analysis- mathematically sifts through which variables have an impact (Gallo, 2015).
Interferential statistical methods are a significant components of data analytics based on its ability to make predictions and generalizations regarding many individuals without getting the information directly from each person one by one but by a sample of data (Descriptive Statistics vs Inferential Statistics, 2019). A great example of using statistical data are reviews that are used to give rations on services. Not every single person that visits a resort completes a review but based on reviews they receive their star ratings.
Another great example is the numbers used to make decision regarding preference in a set area; ‘people who live in the city prefer to take the train verses driving to work’. Inferential statistics are known to be getting closer to many circles, being used often by survey institutions in releasing their results which greatly affect the decisions made for the population (Inferential Statistic, 2019).
Reference:
Descriptive Statistics vs Inferential Statistics. (2019, January 04). Retrieved from
Gallo, A. (2015). A Refresher on Regression Analysis. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/11/a-refresher-on-regression-…
Hayes, A. (2021, September 13). Confidence Interval Definition. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/confidenceint…
Peer #2
Statistics is segmented into two broad categories named descriptive and inferential. Descriptive statistics describe the distribution of variable interest whereas Inferential statistics are used to test hypotheses or make decisions. (Oachs 2020)
Statistical methods involve the carrying out of planning, designing, collecting of data, analyzing of the data and drawing a meaningful interpretation and reporting of the findings. Statistics provide meaning to numbers giving meaningless number, a breath of life for lifeless data.
Statistics being a branch of science that deals with the collection, organization, analysis of data and drawing inference from the samples for a whole population. It requires proper design of the study, appropriate selection of the study samples as well as a choice of a suitable statistics test. (Ali & Bhaskar, 2016)
In burn research the uses a variety of descriptive and inferential methods to present and analyze data. Descriptive methods in burn research include mean, median, standard deviation, and range whereas inferential methods can be used from articles or Journals referencing burns. (Al-Benna et.al 2010)
HIMS 650 Week 5 Inferential Versus Descriptive Statistics
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!