high performance internetworking systems for integrated computer networks
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
high performance internetworking systems for integrated computer networks
INTRODUCTION
Valley Systems was a computer hardware company which manufactured high performance internetworking systems for integrated computer networks and multi-protocol routers, among other products. It had a strong domestic presence and was beginning to expand internationally. The company had
a successful initial public offering (IPO) six months earlier, and had just released its next-generation enterprise router, which to date had received positive reviews and was expected to provide a healthy boost to revenues. Being a public company did bring with it many perks and benefits, but also
meant adhering to much stricter regulatory requirements and the constant scrutiny of Wall Street. It was 5:30 p.m. on a Friday, two weeks before the close of the quarter, and Matt Tucker, president and chief executive officer of Valley Systems, was poring through a stack of financial statements and
sales contracts. Overall, it had been a solid quarter for the company, which had booked several large orders with a number of new enterprise clients while maintaining steady business from its installed base of small and medium-sized customers, some of which were handled through “resellers.”
high performance internetworking systems for integrated computer networks
Despite the healthy sales, Tucker was recently made aware that the company would not make its quarterly numbers based on its current quarter-end shipment schedule. He quickly sent an e-mail to his senior management team (VP of sales and marketing, VP of operations, and the CFO), asking
everyone to meet in the company conference room at 6:00 p.m. to come up with a game plan. Tucker was becoming accustomed to both the increased oversight and the importance of earnings guidance and “meeting or beating” estimates, demands generally not relevant at private companies. He
was also aware that there was a great benefit to the company in achieving This document is authorized for use only by Yun Li in [FINM7401] Finance (St Lucia). Semester 2, 2018 at University of Queensland Business School, 2018. Valley Systems (A) E385-A p. 2 consistency in earnings—smooth and
steady results were perceived as healthier than “lumpy” numbers. Needless to say, Tucker felt a tremendous amount of pressure from the investor community to meet the consensus quarterly earnings estimate. Valley Systems had reported earnings consistent with the Street’s estimate in the first
quarter following its IPO, although the stock had sold off slightly following the announcement. He knew that if the company missed earnings this quarter, its stock price, and thus market capitalization, would take an even bigger hit. Not only could this ring alarm bells on Wall Street and among the
company’s customer base, but it would doubtless also lead to a loss of morale among employees motivated by the value of their options. When the management team gathered at 6:00 p.m., Tucker reviewed their options. The quarter end delivery schedule was made up of a collection of products that
would be built to order and shipped based on a specific delivery slot prioritized by the customer’s order date. The company also had a healthy backlog of large equipment deliveries that were scheduled to ship early the following quarter. If those larger orders were moved forward so that they shipped
in the current quarter, Valley Systems could book that revenue now and achieve its earnings target. Though reconfiguring the delivery schedule would allow Valley to make its numbers, the “swap” was not without consequence. In order to free up capacity for the larger deliveries, several smaller orders
would have to be pushed from the existing quarter to the following one, forcing those companies awaiting product to deal with the inconvenience associated with delay. Similarly, the customers with larger orders would be required to pay for their product earlier than anticipated, a proposition they
likely would not receive well. The scenario was not ideal, but the implications of missing their quarterly earnings the second quarter after their IPO loomed large. Tucker and his team debated their next move.
Questions:
1) If you were Tucker, do you adjust your delivery schedule so that you can meet your quarterly numbers?
2) If so, what are the primary issues likely to arise, and how would you deal with those issues?
3) If not, how do you address investors’ and employees’ concerns regarding missed earnings?
high performance internetworking systems for integrated computer networks
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!