Heart Failure Among the Elderly
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Heart Failure Among the Elderly
Running head: PLANNING STAGE 2-(DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJECT 1
PLANNING STAGE 2- (DESIGN PHASE) OF A RESEARCH PROJECT 8
Planning Stage 2- (Design Phase) of a Research Project
Student name
Florida National University
Planning Stage 2- (Design Phase) of a Research Project
Heart failure is one of the most common types of chronic conditions among the elderly, which results into increased readmissions globally. This statistic is attributable to poor coordination and communication in the transition care settings. The various care settings include skilled nursing facilities, acute-care hospitals, long-standing care facilities and ambulatory stay (Naylor et al., 2017). This research paper is aimed at investigating the reason for poor continuity of care in transition care facilities. A detailed literature review was performed regarding the standard of care in such settings for patients with heart failure. The research methodologies used include case study methods, interviews, and administration of questionnaires. Probability and non-probability methods including stratified sampling and convenience sampling were used as the sampling methodologies. The necessary tools for data collection include questionnaires, interviews, schedules and observation techniques. In addition, an algorithm was created during this design phase. Thus, an insight into the design phase is sought and discussed herein.
Literature Review
Heart failure is a prolonged condition that has been highlighted as one of the top causes of public health complications in the world. The American Journal of Accountable care provides detailed information on heart failure as a public health problem. According to this journal, there are numerous causes of readmission of patients undergoing the transition care model (A Literature Review of Heart Failure Transitional Care Interventions, 2019). The journal highlights various issues, such as early discharge, poor management of underlying problems, poor coordination among key stakeholders and early discharge of patients as the major causes of readmission. All such issues can, however, be prevented and thus this research will discuss some of the coping methods. In addition, the US medical beneficiaries discuss the quality and safety in the transition care model (Teno et al. , 2018). Some of the beneficiaries state their experiences following being admitted into the transition care model. This article complements the previous article by adding real life case study analysis of patients who have been previously admitted to the transition care. Further, interviews of clinicians working in the transition care model are highlighted with an explanation of failure to conduct follow up visits of particular patients.
The American Journal of Public Health explores the affordability of the transition care and the quality of care that some patients can be able to afford. The article has explored the different forms of care based on affordability from the cheapest to the most expensive (Hirschman et al., 2015). This research has shown that since most patients are not able to afford the premium packages, they acquiring poor quality of care. A randomized clinical trial has also been conducted testing patient home based care (Adepoju et al. , 2015). This study involved collecting data and observing willing patients who were undergoing the transition care model and writing down their experiences. Given such an extensive research, the study has filled in the gaps of the previous articles in that the patients were keenly observed and all their experiences duly registered. Thus, these articles form a basis for this research project for they provide the researchers with a founding ground of conducting their research.
Methodology and Design of the Study
The research methods used in this study include case studies, interviews, as well as questionnaires. The case study entails an analysis of patients who were undergoing the transition care model. The selected patients must be willing to participate in the study and provide accurate feedback on their progress. The case study will be undertaken within the period of the admission of the patient into the hospital to determine their experiences when they are subjected to the transition care model and whether they are readmitted to hospital or released to ambulatory stay. During the case study, detailed interviews and observations of the patients willing to take part in the research can be conducted. A longitudinal study can be conducted where the patients undergoing the transition care model are observed throughout the process. Such an approach is beneficial for research purposes and can be used as a research methodology for the research project.
Interviews are also an important form of research methodology that can be used. The researcher will conduct interviews with everyone who is affected by the transition care system including the patients, their care takers, family, as well as the clinicians and the nurses. The reasons for poor continuity of care include lack of follow ups from the physicians and therefore it is important to interview them and establish the reason for such behaviour. Additionally, most family members and care givers lack the necessary information regarding the best forms of care for their patients, which makes them an important part of data collection (Adepoju et al. , 2015). The patients can be interviewed and allowed to express their thoughts regarding the possible improvements. Additionally, questionnaires can be administered to the same group of individuals. These questionnaires allow individuals to express their genuine opinions privately by answering multiple choice questions, closed questions, and open ended questions. Thus, questionnaires and interviews are a critical aspect of the methodology of the research.
Sampling Methodology
The sampling methodology for this research will entail both the probability sampling and the non-probability sampling methods. In the probability sampling method, stratified sampling can be employed. This approach will involve dividing the group of people for the study into subgroups that share common interests. All physicians and nurses for instance could be placed into one group whereas the patients and their care givers could belong to another group. The study can also be done in three different settings where results will be compared for patients from one hospital to those from another hospital. This form of sampling is important for it ensures accurate estimation of health outcomes in the transition care setting. Such a projected result can be attributed to the increased representation, which in turn reduces sampling biases. Non-probability sampling will also be a key feature of sampling method for this research. In this case, convenience sampling will be used, which entails selecting participants based on their willingness to cooperate and their availability for the study. Thus, stratified and convenience sampling are the two important sampling methods that can be used for this research.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!