Health Policy, Politics and Professional Ethics Assignment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Health Policy, Politics and Professional Ethics Assignment Essay
Discussion of an article on “Health Policy, Politics and Professional Ethics”
Group #1
Iraida Guzman
Yunaisi Sarasa
Lisandra Garcia
Silvia Garcia
Indira Cerra
Ana Cabrera
Kensy Chavez
Marilin Castro
Marielis Alfonso
Zuleiky Duenas
Healthcare Policy and Delivery Systems
Dr. Bernadette Dike
Some concepts that must be addressed first:
Health Policy : “Decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a society”. (Carol R. Taylor, Susan I. Belanger, 2019 pp.136).
Professional Ethics: Professional ethics are principles that govern the behavior of a person or group in a business environment. Like values, professional ethics provide rules on how a person should act towards other people and institutions in such an environment. (Lopez, A. ,2018, pp. 1526).
Politics: “Any activity concerned with the acquisition of power, gaining one’s own ends,” is not just for elected officials. (Adnan A. Hyder, David M. Bishai ,2019, pp.156).
Introduction
The interaction among Health Policy, Politics and Professional Ethics has been relatively neglected in public health in past years. However, nowadays it has been proved that those concepts mark an important step forward in promoting active consideration of ethical issues in the politics of public health, including the difficult issues involving the relationships of social justice, power, and community participation, within national and global public health efforts.
An understanding of what influences policy decisions, what determines investments for specific public health interventions, and how agreements are made regarding new programs in public health is crucial for analyzing the ethical implications of public health programs and interventions.
In this sense, the analysis of the article: “An Overview of Ethics, Public Health Policy, and Politics” will help to better understand the interaction among those concepts by examining the ethical considerations related to policy change and health reform and contrast ethical reasoning with policy processes.
Discussion of the Article
The overall goal of the Article is to highlight ethical issues emerging from the work and study of politics and policy development in public health not only in the USA but globally. In this matter, the study, identifies a range of ethical dilemmas that arise in the politics of public health policymaking, and analyzes potential pathways for addressing them.
The authors believe that despite nurses are considered as the country’s most trusted healthcare professionals with a strong commitment to ethical decision making, not all of them take seriously their responsibilities as citizens, despite being frequently reminded that their sheer numbers as the largest group of health professionals. (Carol R. Taylor, Susan I. Belanger, 2019).
Ethical dilemma in nursing profession ( an example from the Article)
One frequent ethical dilemma in nursing practice occurs when considering mandatory vaccination policies from employers. Nurses must consider the interests of the individual with those of the population, in this case, the population of patients served. Ethical arguments in this situation weigh personal choice against the best interests of patients.
Many argue that a nurse’s duty not to harm patients outweighs any restriction on personal choice. Likewise, fairness and promoting the good of patients induces nurses to consider ways to provide protection for their vulnerable patients and to keep them safe. (Carol R. Taylor, Susan I. Belanger, 2019).
Other concepts as Health inequities and Health disparities are explained in the Article as well. According to the authors Health inequities are the “Differences in health that are avoidable, unfair, and unjust and they are affected by social, economic, and environmental conditions” while Health disparities are “the differences in health outcomes among groups of people”. (Carol R. Taylor, Susan I. Belanger, 2019)
People’s health, well-being and nursing practice, are directly affected by decisions made by governments, insurers, and healthcare institutions according to the authors. In this matter, nursing’s challenge, as profits and politics increasingly dictate health priorities, is to keep health care strongly focused on the needs of patients, their families, and the public.
Discussion of the Article (cont.)
Infusing ethics into health practice encourages efforts to convene members of affected communities and to share information and evidence about the harms and benefits of proposed health actions. Moreover, public health informed by ethics is critical, then, not in the sense that it dictates actions that align with principles, but because it encourages deliberations that are more likely to result in ethically informed consensus. Ensuring authentic engagement and voice for affected community members is as important as providing relevant data for their review and shared decision-making.
Discussion of the Article (cont.)
Policy creation process does not reach all communities nowadays. Thus, not too many of those populations are involved in the decisions being taken for their health and welfare. Sometimes public health practitioners assume the speaking role of the community and use their own voice as experts to dictate what should be done about shared health risks, and sometimes nobody speaks or advocates for them.
In this sense, external actors may be necessary to conduct advocacy to achieve appropriate consideration of ethics in public health practice. Governments also have responsibilities for protecting populations against avoidable deaths and the high cost of ill health, and the ethical underpinning of this understanding reflected the social and political context.
Discussion of the Article (cont.)
Limitations of the Study
The Article does not discuss ethical issues pertaining to the general fields of politics, political science, or development studies, and it does not focus on equity issues in the distribution of global resources for health although it mentions the existence of this issues.
Conclusions
The article under analysis represented an important step forward in promoting active consideration of ethics issues in the politics of public health, including the difficult issues involving the relationships of social justice, power, and community participation, within national and global public health efforts.
Ethics has reinforced most health policy change and reform, such as the role of the state versus the individual, the responsibility of society for the poor, and balancing not doing any harm against shifting conceptions of goodness and virtue. The policy process and ethical reasoning share many of the same attributes, and policymakers have a responsibility to embrace ethical reasoning in the process to advance better health outcomes. About this, ethical concerns can motivate policy change and health reform and how ethics influences the policymaking process and highlighted specific health policy outcomes, and ethical concerns have been part of the policy process for years.
Conclusions
Politics are present in every aspect of healthcare. In this sense, healthcare administrators make decisions that impact both, nurses and the populations of patients they serve everyday.
Nurses are in key positions to influence hospital decisionmakers and to share the realities of the daily care of patients and they have the greatest influence when they are well-informed, open-minded, collaborative, and willing to do what is right, even if there is a personal cost.
Action-oriented public health, informed by ethics, helps to guide practice that includes deliberative spaces for stakeholders where dialogue can take place, and can lead to consensus and action agreed upon by affected parties.
References
Adnan A. Hyder, David M. Bishai (2019). An Overview of Ethics, Public Health Policy, and Politics. The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics Edited by Anna C. Mastroianni, Jeffrey P. Kahn, and Nancy E. Kass. Pp.23-35.
Carol R. Taylor, Susan I. Belanger (2019). Health policy, politics, and professional ethics. Lancet 372(9649). pp 129-134.
Lopez, A. (2018) Health and Health-Research Priorities: Has WHO Got It Right? Lancet 372(9649). Pp. 1525–1527.
Stuckler, D., King, L., Robinson, H., and McKee, M. (2008) WHO’s Budgetary Allocations and Burden of Disease: A Comparative Analysis. Lancet 372(9649). pp 1563–1669.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!