HCA430 Barriers and Limitations Facing the Proposed Model Program
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Barriers and Limitations Facing the Proposed Model Program
x
HCA430: Special Populations
Instructor: x
21 April 2021
Barriers and Limitations Facing the Proposed Model Program
Currently, in the United States, someone gets detained each twenty-five seconds due to drug-related charges. Lawmakers enhanced enforcement measures and implemented strict sentencing laws for low-level drug misdemeanors to minimize or carb drug and substance abuse. The country’s transformation to a mass incarceration society reinforces the wrong choices made by the policymakers using measures and policies that were poorly designed. Failure to acquire drug treatment may aggravate the United States’ health inequalities and worsen the addict’s negative health effects.
Due to the country’s irrefutable need for drug and substance abuse treatment, the proposed model program aims to make it easy for addicts to accept treatment which is a major challenge in most settings. Regardless, this step is usually filled with a myriad of barriers, specifically financial constraints. The majority of addicts do not seek treatment due to the fear of the costs related to obtaining access to a qualified treatment facility. As a result, cost becomes a key hindrance to treatment, particularly in the United States. For instance, in a survey conducted by Farabee et al. (1998), over two thousand out-of-treatment drug users in the United States stated that they have unsuccessfully attempted to seek treatment due to lack of enough funds.
In a study conducted by Pullen and Oser (2014), inadequate funding for substance abuse treatment was an issue that came up severally in the focus groups, making it a significant macro-level barrier. In different ways, counselors insisted that underfunding introduces problems for retaining and attracting qualified personnel and attaining basic addict’s needs. Educational resources for both clients and counselors are very important, yet the challenges in offering and accessing these resources are undeniable given the budgetary limitations. Acquiring continuing education is crucial to counselors for obtaining learning skills required to enhance performance with addicts.
The absence of interagency cooperation is a major barrier and significantly impacts the client’s success. Effective client treatment necessitates more than substance abuse counseling. It requires other varying complementary services like mental health services and supervised detoxification. Providing these services necessitates cooperation among the network of providers and facilities. Although urban areas may have more access to facilities, they still encounter the challenges of arranging detoxification and other necessary services for the patients. Offering mental health services necessitates strong links and cooperation with other facilities and agencies. Discontinuity in treatment services is also a result of weak links between facilities. A care continuum involves a tiered and tailored technique in which clients move effortlessly through treatment facilities depending on their progress.
Insurance plans should reduce the coverage variability within and between private and federal players. Clients may be responsible for meeting a high deductible, facility fees, co-insurance, and co-pay until co-insurance starts. Regardless, they should also be made aware of the out-of-pocket expenses and anticipation of benefits. Furthermore, the federal government should consider increasing arbitrary visit limits annually. It can also focus on shifting to a quality-centered approach that will enable clients to attain services outside the scope of the insurance’s benefits without the clients having to increase provider fees. Furthermore, any increase in premiums should lead to enhanced benefits, with clients being educated on where the out-of-pocket costs will be low based on the services offered.
Since the client and the organization benefit from the counselor’s continuous training and professionalism, there should be minimal out-of-pocket costs required for the counselor’s resources and books. Consequently, additional financing is vital since it will remove the disincentive for counselors. Additionally, more educational material should be provided to facilities to aid in the client’s recovery. Just as clients indirectly and directly gain from the resources and financial aid offered to facilities and counselors, an increase in funding will be critical to their success. Furthermore, by adopting a client-centered approach, the new policy can pursue all possible funding sources.
By realistically assessing the program’s limitations and strengths, rehabilitation centers should adopt a collaboration strategy that will enable them to implement techniques that are focused on meeting the client’s needs (Mojtabai & Zivin, 2003). Collaborative relationships with service providers, including mental health services, public housing agencies, law enforcement, vocational rehabilitation, and welfare partners can ensure all persons will substance abuse disorders can obtain access to treatment. Furthermore, services providers may find it advantageous to build strong links with other treatment programs. For instance, a provider with a highly advanced information system can conduct data analysis and gathering which another focuses on mental health.
The federal government safeguards information regarding drug and substance use. This protection may encourage users to seek treatment by guaranteeing that they will not encounter future discrimination because of drug misuse. Furthermore, the federal laws may be backed by state laws that also offer mental health and medical information protection (Simon, Giroux, & Chor, 2020). Consequently, the proposed model program should put in place mechanisms to ensure any information collected remains confidential. Since the proposed model program will also treat opioid dependence, it will also require certification and accreditation by the Federal government. Equality and impartiality are important ethical considerations that necessitate all clients to receive equal treatment. In this regard, orientation sessions in the proposed model program should incorporate issues regarding ethics.
References
Farabee, D., Leukefeld, C., & & Hays, L. (1998). Accessing Drug-Abuse Treatment: Perceptions of Out-of-Treatment Injectors. Journal of Drug Issues, 381-394.
Mojtabai, R., & Zivin, J. G. (2003). Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Four Treatment Modalities for Substance Disorders: A Propensity Score Analysis. Health Serv Res, 233–259.
Pullen, E., & Oser, C. (2014). Barriers to Substance Abuse Treatment in Rural and Urban Communities: A Counselor Perspective. Subst Use Misuse, 891-901.
Simon, R., Giroux, J., & Chor, J. (2020). Effects of Substance Use Disorder Criminalization on American Indian Pregnant Individuals. AMA Journal of Ethics.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!