Guided Field Experience Term Assignment Project

Guided Field Experience Term Assignment Project

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order	5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions Your program requires three guided field experiences that will require you to teach lessons to a small or whole group. For each of these lessons, the field experience teacher at your placement site will use the Guided Field Experience Rubric to evaluate your performance on the pre-assessment, instruction, post-assessment, and reflection of the lesson. Follow the instructions below to ensure you complete all necessary components of the guided field experience. Site Demographics Provide the following information about the school and class demographics at your placement site. Write your responses on a separate document. Type of school (public/charter/private) School diversity (predominant demographics, specialized populations served) Title I school? (Y/N) Content area, grade level, and state standards that will be addressed Description of the student diversity in class (special education, remedial education, English language learners, gifted and talented, ethnic or cultural) Description of the grouping strategy based on student information Description of how the site demographics information will influence your approach to teaching this group of children Guided Field Experience Worksheet Your program requires three guided field experiences that will require you to teach lessons to a small or whole group. For each of these lessons, the field experience teacher at your placement site will use the Guided Field Experience Rubric to evaluate your performance on the pre-assessment, instruction, post-assessment, and reflection of the lesson. Follow the instructions below to ensure you complete all necessary components of the guided field experience. Site Demographics Provide the following information about the school and class demographics at your placement site. Write your responses on a separate document. Type of school (public/charter/private) School diversity (predominant demographics, specialized populations served) Title I school? (Y/N) Content area, grade level, and state standards that will be addressed Description of the student diversity in class (special education, remedial education, English language learners, gifted and talented, ethnic or cultural) Description of the grouping strategy based on student information Description of how the site demographics information will influence your approach to teaching this group of children Guided Field Experience Complete the following steps and observations. Write your responses on a separate document and submit the file along with your Lesson Plan Template to your course instructor. Part 1: Pre-Assessment and Data Analysis (Domain 1) Pre-assess students – Speak to your field experience teacher and select one of the following: Create and administer a pre-assessment Administer a teacher-prepared pre-assessment Observe a teacher administering a pre-assessment Collect pre-assessment data from your field experience teacher What assessment was used? Describe the assessment, detailing why it was chosen and how it aligns with the content area standard(s), lesson learning goal(s), and objective(s). How did you or the teacher score the assessment? What does the data tell you? What were the students’ key areas of opportunities and strengths? How can these data inform your future instruction? Provide a graphic representation of the results. Part 2: Instructional Planning and Lesson Delivery (Domains 2 and 3) Create a lesson to teach to learners in a small-group or whole-group setting (one-on-one instruction may also be an option if group instruction is not available) based on your analysis of the pre-assessment data. Consider the following questions when developing your lesson plan: How will you create a positive and respectful classroom environment? What specific modifications and adjustments will you make to the learning environment to accommodate all students? What are your expectations for student engagement for your lesson? What routines or procedures will you implement to facilitate your lesson delivery? Based on your analysis of pre-assessment data, what instructional strategies will you implement to teach your objectives? Complete the Lesson Plan Template outlining your approach. Consult with your field experience teacher to determine the type of post-assessment you will use and how you will administer it to students. Deliver the lesson based on your completed Lesson Plan Template. Part 3: Post-Assessment and Data Analysis (Domain 1) After the lesson delivery, administer the post-assessment to determine the extent to which students met the lesson objectives. What assessment was used? How did you or the teacher score the assessment? What does the data tell you? What were the students’ key areas of opportunities and strengths? How did the students perform on the post-assessment in relation to the pre-assessment? How can post-assessment data inform your future instruction? Provide a graphic representation of the results. Part 4: Reflection (Domain 4) Record your observations and thoughts on your lesson delivery in an informal anecdotal record or journal. This record does not need to be APA-formatted, but will accompany the submission of your paper. Consider reflective questions like: What went well? What didn’t go well? How did you feel throughout the process? How did the students respond? What could you have done differently? Write a minimum 700-word reflection of your instructional experience based on these observations. Include the following sections in your paper: Analysis of results Did students master the lesson objective(s)? Why or why not? What explanations do you think may account for the results? How can this explanation be supported by theory or research? Reflective practice What opportunities may I have missed? What would I do differently next time? Educator dispositions Reflect on your planning and lesson delivery and the dispositions of effective educators outlined below. In what areas did you do well, and how can you continue to develop in all areas? Professional competence and responsibility Professional and collaborative relationships (valuing diversity) Critical thinking and reflection
RUBRIC Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization;  and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!