Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
GSBA 542 MS Finance Scholars Semester Self-Reflective Memo
FROM:
SUBJECT: Final Exam – Semester Self-Reflective Memo
DATE: November 29, 2022
It has a been a pleasure watching your professional communication skills develop and improve—
even just meeting once a week. I suggest it is important to reflect on what you have
accomplished this semester. This exam is designed to allow you to showcase your written
communication skills and reflect on your own progress this semester.
The final exam memo is due by end-of-day (11:59 p.m. PST) on Wednesday, December 7, 2022.
The exam is worth 75 points and is designed to allow you to appraise what you learned this
semester by considering the following.
• What did you learn?
• Did you meet your goals?
• How did your team communicate, and did your team meet their objectives?
Semester Self-Reflective Memo
When preparing your memo, please do not think that you must try to convince me that you or
your team were effective or be critical of your team members. Rather, your goal is to analyze
whether and how you met your semester goals, objectives and the events and behaviors that took
place during the preparation and delivery of the presentations (positive and negative). Explain
them, discuss why they occurred, and evaluate the outcome of these events and behaviors.
1. What did you learn?
Evaluate what you learned this semester in GSBA 542. Thinking about the assignments,
exercises, and topics covered. Consider the following: written messages, communication
styles, team communication, planning and delivering presentations, leadership
communication, slide design, persuasion, interviews, networking, EQ, and the use of the
SDI assessment to name a few of the objectives of the course.
2. Did you meet your goals?
Look back at your Communication Development Plan and your SMART goals and
respond to how you did or did not meet your goals. Be specific with examples of what
you did right and what you need to improve/change in the future to meet your goals.
Were your goals realistic?
3. How did your team communicate, and did your team meet their objectives?
Discuss your team’s communication processes beginning with the assignment of the
teams through the Presentation #4 delivery. Assess each team member’s (including your
own) participation and communication during meetings, preparation processes, and the
final presentation.
GSBA 542 MSF/Fall 2022 Final Exam Page 2
• Describe the section of the presentation each team member researched and prepared.
• Communicate the performance of your team members. Describe each person’s behavior
during the preparation and delivery processes. Provide specific examples to support each
assertion.
• Explain how each member of your team was engaged in the process. Explain how each
team member supported other members to strengthen team dynamics and improve the
team’s performance.
• Explain your behavior as a team member. Defend your behavior and discuss what you
did well and what you’d like to improve in future team experiences. Again, focus on
specific examples to support your assertions.
• Evaluate the performance of your team. Discuss how well your team met its objectives.
Was there any conflict? If so, how was it resolved? What did you learn from the conflict?
Were there significant time management issues? If so, how were they resolved?
Particulars
Length: Most memoranda, single-spaced and effectively formatted, will be about two to three
pages (approximately 1200 words). The final exam memo will not be graded on how effective
you or your team were; rather, it will be judged on how effectively you evaluate and
communicate your growth and the process through-out the semester.
Adhere to the written document guidelines discussed this semester.
• Paragraphs should be flush left/ragged right
• Margins should be 1”
• Single spaced paragraphs, double spaced between paragraphs (this document is
12-point font, single spaced with double spaces between paragraphs)
• Please use Times New Roman or another serif-type font, 12-point
• Avoid breaking up tables or lists on two or more pages
• Keep paragraphs under ten (10) lines
• At a minimum use headings to improve the appeal and readability and consider
using vertical lists
• Correct English grammar, punctuation, and spelling
• Add page numbers starting on page 2
• Submit as a Word Document
Due
Submit to Turnitin by end-of-day (11:59 p.m. PST) on Wednesday, December 7, 2022.
Late submissions will receive a full-grade reduction. Technical considerations are not acceptable
reasons for late submissions—please plan accordingly.
Have a great winter break and fight on!
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!