Group Contract to The Unit Chair Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Group Contract to The Unit Chair Assignment
Each group of four students is to submit a poster with the completed Group Contract to the Unit Chair the Unit Chair will arrange your submission time.
Each member of the group is to speak (maximum of 2 minutes each) to an aspect of the poster in the timetabled session. Each group is to prepare a hard copy (A4 B & W) of the poster as a handout for each student in the group. Student instructions for assessment task Poster
The following instructions are designed to assist you with the assessment task Establishing the group and member roles
1. , roles of group members and dates/times of meetings. Each group will be required to complete a group charter and project summary. The relevant document can be found in the Assessment folder on the unit Cloud site.
2. Each group is to identify a group leader whose role it is to co-ordinate the poster presentation Poster Content
1. Access relevant contemporary literature. References should mainly include refereed journal articles and ideally be no more than eight years old. Information from professional websites may also be used. References to google websites and/or Wikipedia are not appropriate for this assessment task.
2. Read the marking rubric for information about the concepts, performance standards and marks distribution for the poster. Poster Design
1. Each poster is to be presented on A3 sized paper, using the template provided (Available on the HNN026 Cloud site).
2. Each poster is to be accompanied by the completed Group Contract form which states each student’s contribution and includes all of the members signatures.
3. A copy of each poster is to be provided as a handout for each student in your seminar group (approx. 57 copies required).
4. Acknowledge sources and adhere to referencing conventions as per APA Style.
5. Reference sources (citations) should occur in very small 8pt font on the poster itself.
6. Adhere to conventions of written English (word choice, professional language, grammar, use of appropriate sentence structure, punctuation and spelling).
Read the marking rubric for information about the concepts, performance standards and marks distribution for the poster. Oral Presentation:
1. Each group member is required to actively participate in the oral presentation at the allocated date and time.
2. Each student will be allocated two minutes to speak to an aspect of the poster. This time limit will also apply for groups with more than four members.
3. Each presenter is to use one slide with content relevant to their aspect of the poster.
4. Your presentation style must include engagement of the audience by using eye contact rather than referring to notes and adherence to the conventions of spoken English (word choice, professional language, grammar).
5. Each group will be awarded a shared mark for their poster.
6. Each student will be awarded an individual mark for their oral presentation. Please note: If a member of a group does not complete their part of the work towards the poster and/or the presentation they will receive a mark of 0.
Read the marking rubric for information about the concepts, performance standards and marks distribution for the oral presentation. HNN026 Legal, Ethical and Contemporary Issues in Australian Nursing Practice
Poster Presentation 32% of the total mark
Total marks for this assessment = 80
Performance High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Standards
Demonstrates an integrated knowledge of the nurse’s role in providing
culturally
competent quality and safe patient care in the Australian Healthcare setting. (30 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor errors/gaps (24-30 marks) All elements of this criterion met with several minor errors/gaps (21-23 marks) Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor errors/gaps or one significant gap or error (18-20 marks) Most elements of the criterion met but has more than one significant error/gaps (15-17 marks) Does not demonstrate understanding of the nurses role in the provision of culturally competent quality and safe patient care the Australian Healthcare setting. (0-14 marks) Strategies and/or guidelines to assist the development of nurses to provide culturally
competent nursing care included. (20 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor
errors/gaps (16-20 marks) All elements of this criterion met with several minor errors/gaps (14-15 marks) Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor errors/gaps or one significant gap or error (12-13 marks) Most elements of the criterion met but has more than one significant error/gaps (10-11 marks) Strategies and/or guidelines to assist the development of nurses to provide culturally competent nursing care are either too few and or not related to cultural competence and/or quality and safe nursing care (0-9 marks)
Relevant literature selected and used to support
presentation (10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor
errors/gaps (8-10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with several minor errors/gaps (7 marks) Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor errors/gaps or one significant gap or
error (6 marks) Most elements of the criterion met but has more than one significant error/gaps (5 marks) Inadequate literature to support points made. (0-4 marks)
Referencing style is accurate and consistent
with APA style (10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with occasional minor
errors/gaps (8-10 marks) All elements of this criterion met with several minor errors/gaps (7 marks) Most elements of this criterion met but has many minor errors/gaps or one significant gap or
error (6 marks) Most elements of the criterion met but has more than one significant error/gaps (5 marks) Consistently incorrect referencing style (0-4 marks)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!