Griffith’s 1915 Research Paper on the Birth of a Nation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Please write an annotated bibliography in Chicago citation style for one of the films listed in the PDF document.
GUIDELINES FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Bibliographies should use a 12-point font with 1-inch margins.
The Chicago citation style should be used to list your sources (see below).
Following each citation, one to two sentences should be used to briefly describe the source.
the source’s content and its relevance to your film
At least eight sources that are specifically focused on should be included in bibliographies.
the movie you’ve chosen We recommend that you find at least twelve to ensure that you have enough.
if some of them turn out to be insufficient
For American films, the sources must be from within two years of the film’s release.
International films have a five-year window of opportunity.
Instructions for conducting research and compiling a bibliography:
Research: You’ll need to find written sources from the time your film was made and released to learn more about it. Film reviews, interviews with the filmmakers, advertisements, or articles in industry trades about the production, premiere, theatrical exploitation, or box office performance are examples.
a. The Media History Digital Library is the best place to look for these sources. Lantern.mediahist.org is the URL for the search engine.
b. Enter your film title in the Search box (using “quotes” if the title contains common words may help), then narrow the years (on the left side) to two years before and after your film’s release year (or five years after for international films).
c. Go over the results (don’t just pick the first eight that appear!). You’ll need to gather information from a variety of sources. It’s not good research to have eight advertisements or eight box office reports. Advertisements, articles, interviews, industry reports, and reviews should all be present.
d. Click “Read in Context” when you find one that looks interesting. The magazine will open, though the page may be incorrect. To find the right one, you often have to go back a page or two.
e. If you can’t seem to find enough good sources:
i. Look up the star or director of your movie.
ii. Concentrate on one of the ‘Collections,’ such as ‘Fan Magazines’ or ‘Technical Journals,’ for example.
iii. If you’re looking for international films, you’ll have to search up to five years after they were released in the United States, as they often take a long time to get here. They could have been released under different names.
Annotation:
After that, you’ll annotate each citation in your bibliography. This demonstrates that you have read your sources and understand how they will contribute to your paper.
a. You must know what publication you are using in order to properly annotate it. You can click on the title of the periodical, such as “Motion Picture Daily,” in the search results. This will take you to a page with information about the book or volume. A “Description” at the bottom should tell you about the publication and its intended audience.
This is a review of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari from a major American trade paper aimed at exhibitors, says the annotation. It demonstrates how American critics enjoyed the film but did not comprehend its potential to connect with audiences.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!