Gravity Model of Trade Economics Worksheet
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Gravity Model of Trade Economics Worksheet
The Gravity Model of Trade (see Feenstra, page 192-196) predicts that trade increases with the partner country’s GDP: the bigger your partner country’s GDP, the more you trade with that country. The model also predicts that trade decreases with trade costs, which can be proxied by the distance to the partner country, along with other variables. Specifically, the further away your partner, the less you trade with that country. In this assignment you will test these hypotheses.
Step 1: Collect your data. You will need data on trade flows, GDP, and distance between your country and its 20 largest trading partners. Note that this data is helpfully collected for all trading partners for the years 1948-2019 at CEPII (http://www.cepii.fr/cepii/en/bdd_modele/presentation.asp?id=8 However, the dataset too large to open in excel, thus I would only recommend it for students more comfortable with other statistical tools. All the documentation for the dataset can be found at the CEPII link above. You can also collect your own data from the following sources:
- Trade Flows.Use the United Nations Comtrade database to download total imports and exports between your country and all of its trading partners in 2019. Once you have this data, calculate total trade as the sum of exports plus imports associated with each partner. Note that this data is in nominal U.S. dollars (See helpful comtrade hints).
- Nominal GDP Data.Use the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators ) to download nominal GDP in US dollars for each partner country in your dataset.
- Distance data can be found from CEPII at the website:
http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm . The file dist_cepii.xls is a spreadsheet file in Microsoft Excel format which contains distances between countries in kilometers.
The country codes are three-letter ISO codes. You can find a list of ISO codes here: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search
Step 2: Choose a sample country to Visualize your data. Make a scatter plot of your data that allows you to visualize the size of the country (GDP) as a determinant of trade. It should have GDP (as a percentage of the GDP of all the partner countries in your dataset) on the horizontal axis and total trade (as a percentage of total trade of all the partner countries in your dataset) on the vertical axis.
Step 3: Estimate the coefficients of the gravity equation: (see attached file)
You should estimate coefficients b and c using multiple regression analysis, which can be done in a spreadsheet package or in a statistical software package. The following website has a nice summary of doing regression analysis in excel for those of you who aren’t familiar with this tool:
https://www.excel-easy.com/examples/regression.html
Write your report. Start with a general discussion of the gravity model, how you will test it, and what data you are using. Carefully report the results from your scatter plot and interpret the coefficients you estimate. Include your scatterplot and a Table of your coefficient estimates. Conclude your report by analyzing whether the gravity model seems to fit the trade data from your country. You should also turn in the statistical package output or spreadsheet that you used to analyze your results.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!