Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Note
This task is very important, so please follow the requirements below to complete
This course is Global: Analysis and Response
The country chosen for this mission is Greece in Southern Europe
The structure of this article must be based on the following requirements.
This is a fussy professor’s task, so it must be done carefully.
Week 4 Assignment 2The objective of this assignment is for you to assess the competitiveness of a country in the global marketplace based on the Schwab categories and pillars. For the purpose of this paper, Select 1 country from your cluster. You can incorporate this into your final paper along with a similar analysis on the other countries.
For your (selected) country, analyze the competitive position of each country using Schwab categories and pillars.
Schwab, K. (2018). The Global Competitive Report 2018. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitveness-report-2018
Questions to address and analyze:
1. Explain the grading associated with the indices by synthesizing your analysis of population characteristic, trade, technology, foreign investment, income distribution to national competitiveness?
2. What conclusions have you come to regarding this country?
My expectations:
• This is not a Q&A paper, although you will be evaluated on whether you have failed to address any issues. Create a cohesive paper that connects all the points with a proper introduction and conclusion.
• Research data. Do not hesitate to analyze or explain the data, and the assumptions underlying the data.
• The paper must follow the APA style for the structure, spacing, etc. All references must also be in APA style. There is a link in Modules with a link for APA information.
• There must in-text citations and a reference page. Data tables can be placed at the end of the paper. They must be appropriately numbered and sourced. The body of the paper should make a reference to the data, where appropriate.
• At no time, or no way should you violate academic integrity. Please be keenly aware that you will be found out and the entire paper can receive a zero. Therefore, it is the responsibility of the team to demand to review sources and check for plagiarism.
Grading Rubric
%
CRITERION EXCELLENT
90+ GOOD
80-89 AVERAGE
70 -79 NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
60 – 69 FAILED
<60
115%
Schwab multidimensional model for measuring national competitiveness.
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the various indices.
Demonstrates sufficient understanding of the various indices.
Demonstrates limited understanding of the various indices.
Demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the subject.
Fails to demonstrate a basic understanding of the various indices.2
25% Analysis using the various indices
Each of the pillars of competitiveness is applied. Provides a detailed analysis of the factors underlying the value of each measurement. Demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the subject. Relates some important events and consequences
Raises few political and economic hurdles arising from OBOR. Demonstrates a limited understanding of the subject. Relates a few important events and consequences
Demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the subject.
Does not connect the various topics into a whole.
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the subject.
Does not identify any cause and effect.
325% Analysis of the country’s long term prospects
The analysis of the long term prospects cover all areas of Schwab’ measurements. The challenges and priorities are well thought out and explained in a coherent mannerThe analysis of the long term prospects covers most areas of Schwab’ measurements. The challenges and priorities are addressed. The analysis of the long term prospects covers few of areas of Schwab’ measurements. The challenges and priorities are not adequately addressed The analysis of the long term prospects using areas of Schwab’ measurements is inadequate. The challenges and priorities minimally addressed Fails to provide coherent analysis.
420% Conclusions Draws well thought out conclusions regarding competitiveness by synthesizing learning throughout the course.
Draws competent conclusions regarding competitiveness by synthesizing some, but not all, of learning throughout the course.Draws adequate conclusions regarding competitiveness by synthesizing a few of the learning throughout the course.
Draws inadequate conclusions regarding competitiveness. Provides inadequate synthesis, of learning throughout the course.Fails to draws well thought out conclusions
515% Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines
Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness; APA formatting is appropriate and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. Individual contributions are seamlessly integrated. Organized by sections and subsections.
Provides 5+ excellent research citations. Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still offers a clear presentation of ideas; Individual contributions to the paper are well organized through proper transitions. APA formatting is used. Insufficiently organized by sections/subsections. Limited research citations <5. Few References are from unreliable sources. Frequent grammar / spelling errors. Individual contributions to the paper are somewhat adequately organized, although the limited effort is made to properly transition individual sections. Limited APA formatting. Insufficiently organized by sections/subsections. Limited research citations <3.
References are poor quality Writing contains several grammatical errors; inadequate organization of the material. Individual contributions to the paper are not transitioned to create a holistic paper. APA formatting is minimally applied. Limited to no sections/subsections. Limited research citations <2 Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; poorly organized and does not follow specified guidelines. No attempt is made to organize individual contributions into a complete paper. APA formatting is not used. No sections/subsections. No research citations
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!