Glassner’s Ideas Annotated Bibliography Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
An annotated bibliography consists of a list of Works Cited entries, each followed by a paragraph of summary and a few sentences explaining how you plan to use that information in your speech. This is the best way to prepare to write a research-based speech because locating, reading, and annotating your sources early will help you to better understand the debate at hand, begin forming mini- summaries that you might be able to use in your essay, and select passages that you will quote in your final speech. An additional bonus of putting together an annotated bibliography is that when you are done, you will have a rough outline of your speech and a head start on your Works Cited page.
1. Find, read, and annotate your sources. The requirement is three sources–one source should come from professional, academic, or scholarly articles written for peer-reviewed publications. You can locate these by using one of the approved MDC library databases (please keep in mind that you are required to have a total of 4 sources for your full-preparation scripts). However, for this assignment you dont need to annotate ALL your sources.
2. Create Works Cited entries for each of the sources. The citations for each article should be typed, double-spaced, and arranged alphabetically by authors last names, according to APA style guidelines. The owl Purdue website is an excellent source for citation. You can find a link for this in your Blackboard Course entitled APA-Style Help. A word of caution here, do not blindly trust computer-generated Works Cited entries.
3. Following each citation, you should write a one-paragraph description of that work, beginning with a full signal phrase and one-sentence paraphrased summary, and indicating the thesis, conclusion, and any important details.
4. In your summary paragraph, quote at least one passage from each article using a signal phrase and parenthetical citation. Remember to provide in-text citations for specific paraphrased information as well.
5. Next, write a short paragraph (a couple sentences) describing how you intend to use that authors ideas and connecting them to ideas from the other articles you have found, if possible. How will the source function in your paper? What role will it play? Decide which details or passages from the article will be most helpful for putting together your paper.
6. Double-space the Works Cited entries and single-space the annotations (the summary paragraphs that follow each entry).See reverse for a sample Works Cited entry followed by sample annotation paragraphs.
A successful Annotated Bibliography Assignment:
? Follows the instructions on this assignment sheet exactly
? Cites and annotates the required number and type of sources for the specified assignment
(found on the first page of this document).
? Includes a double-spaced APA-formatted Works Cited entry for each source, alphabetizes entries by authors last names
? Includes at least a one single-spaced paragraph that summarizes the main argument and any relevant details from each source)
? Begins each summary paragraph with a full signal phrase and one-sentence paraphrase of the articles overall main point (topic + stance + reasons)
? Includes one quote from each article, introduced with a short signal phrase and followed by a parenthetical citation if the source has page numbers
? Includes parenthetical citations for any specific paraphrased details
? Includes one single-spaced short paragraph explaining how the sources information will be used in the final project and how it relates to the information in the other sources (three total)
? Uses formal academic English
Below is an example of one annotation
Glassner, B. (2004). Narrative techniques of fear mongering. Social Research, 71(4), winter, 819-826. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://search. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=15868567&site=ehost-live.
In Narrative Techniques of Fear Mongering, Barry Glassner notes that the news media and politicians sell fear to the public in order to reap financial and political benefits. Fear mongers employ three main techniques for narrating and promoting fear. The first is repetition; by sheer volume, those who sell fear are able to bombard the public with scare stories that will make them consume products and vote in certain ways (Glassner, p. 820). The second technique is what Glassner calls christening isolated incidents as trends (p. 822). By claiming that a freak occurrence is a trend, the politicians and media are able to peddle their product of fear. The third technique that Glassner points out is misdirection, or highlighting a lesser danger in order to conceal more ominous ones (p. 823). Glassners main point is that our fears are being manipulated in the interests of those in positions of power.
For my purposes, Glassners ideas will work very well with my discussion of the narrative nature of the education system, as noted by Paulo Freire. Also, it seems that Glassner would agree with
Freire that if our education system was based more on a communicative approach to learning, then we might not be as susceptible to these narrative techniques.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!