GEOG 309-500 Electricity Consumption paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
GEOG 309-500 Electricity Consumption paper
GEOG 309-500 Electricity Consumption paper (Kill-a-watt)
You will collect data on electrical appliances and devices (video games, computers, coffee makers, etc.) using the Kill-a-watt submeter. A data sheet attached here will help you organize data collection. You should design your data collection as a test or evaluations of claims made in the literature regarding household energy consumption (recall my lecture on Energy Efficiency). Your final draft, a 5-8-page paper, is due 26 April 2019 for 35% of your final grade. Scholarly sources are required. A good starting point is the “behavioral wedge” is the idea that modest actions of individuals could result in large reductions of energy consumption and carbon emission—without dramatic lifestyle alterations; see Dietz et al., 2009, “Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon missions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 106:18452-56). Take this a step further: Which scholars cite Dietz? Which scholars cite the “Cost of Play” study?
Your task is to convert your household into a “laboratory” for collecting electricity consumption data. Before moving appliances and unplugging devices, maintain normal safety that you would use around electricity! Do NOT put yourself at risk of electrical shock during this assignment. Use the scholarly and grey literature to develop an experiment or test within the constraints of your household. If you have access to your household’s electricity bill, you can compare billed kWh to your measurements. Do NOT experiment with cell phone chargers because the electricity use does not yield an interesting paper.
The attached rubric provides guidance regarding required elements of the paper. An in-class update is required on 5 April 2019.
Data Collection for Kill-a-watt submeter
- For “episodic” use: obtain KWH per use, then estimate number of uses per year
Item/mode KWH Uses per year KWH per year
Episodic use normally involves devices with fluctuating Watt measurements, such as coffee makers and dishwashers. For these, measure KWH at the end of the cycle (coffee, laundry, dishes, rice, etc.)
- For “continuous” use: obtain watts, then estimate hours and convert to KWH, so that watts * hours / 1,000 = KWH
Item/mode Watts Extrapolation assumption (hours/day,
times/week)
Convert to KWH (watts * hours / 1,000) KWH per year
Continuous use normally involves TVs, oscillating fans, standby power, and other items and modes for which Watts do not change over time. For these items, you may record Watts and then extrapolate considering hours per day or week.
Definitions
Watt: power (how fast electrons move through wires)
kWh: energy (volume of electrons moving through wires)
100 watts = 100 J/sec 🡪 100 watts used for 1 hour = 100 watt/hour = 0.1 kWh (divide by 1,000)
W to kWh 🡪 divide W by 1000, then multiply by # hours
Grading Rubric: Kill-a-Watt Project
Criterion 0 = absent 10 = excellent **Use full range of marks** I. Introduction and Background -Is the title succinct and informative?
– How well does the author frame the question as a “test” of a claim in the scholarly or “grey” literature?
-How well does the author state the argument?
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
II. Methods -How well does the author describe the Kill-a-watt data collection procedure(s)?
-Does the summary data collection table show thoughtful use of the submeter and careful use of assumptions for extrapolation?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 III. Findings – Are the findings supported by data collected with submeter? -Are the findings robust?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IV. Discussion – How well does the author relate findings to the scholarly or “grey” literature?
– How well does the author discuss limitations of the research?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 V. Conclusion – How well does the conclusion synthesize the argument and future research?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 VI. References -Does the author use the CMOS correctly and consistently? (alpha list; full details; author year: page)
0 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL (100 possible)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!