Generating Support for Evidence-Based Practices (SOCW 6311)
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Generating Support for Evidence-Based Practices (SOCW 6311)
When working with clients, social workers must make sure that the evidence-based treatment is appropriate for the client and the situation. The social worker must then persuade the client and other stakeholders to endorse the evidence-based practice that has been chosen. To gain that support, the social worker should give a strategy for implementation as well as evidence of the evidence-based practice’s efficacy and appropriateness to the client and stakeholders. Social workers must show that they have carefully assessed the procedures required to adopt the evidence-based practice, identified elements in the existing environment that support implementation, and addressed those that may obstruct its implementation.
You will play the position of the social worker in the Levy case study in this week’s Discussion. You’ll pick an evidence-based strategy and try to enlist the help of both the client and the supervisor. To do so, you’ll look at the efficacy, appropriateness, and elements that could affect the evidence-based practice’s implementation.
Review Levy Episode 2 to prepare for this discussion. Locate an evidence-based practice that you believe would be appropriate for Jake’s case utilizing the registries supplied in this week’s materials and the Walden Library. Then, from the resources section of the SAMHSA website, look over the Evidence-Based Practice Kit for Family Psycho Education. Take note of all the processes and factors required in putting the evidence-based practice into effect, and which ones apply in this circumstance. Consider factors like agency support, resources, and prices that could help or hinder the implementation of the evidence-based intervention you choose.
Describe the following information, titles, and details in a 500-word discussion post:
-An assessment of the evidence-based practice you chose for Jake.
– Explain the practice and the research that backs it up.
– Justify why you believe this intervention is necessary for Jake.
– Then, for the supervisor’s benefit, explain any implementation-related difficulties.
– Explain why you feel two variables are important for successful implementation of the evidence-based practice.
– Next, select two factors that you believe may obstruct implementation and describe how you plan to address them.
– Include at least three APA references and citations from the following texts in your paper.
Readings that are required
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) document (2009c). Starting with evidence-based strategies in family psychoeducation. http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/GettingStarted-FP.pdf was retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/GettingStarted-FP.pdf (PDF)
Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. HHS Pub. No. SMA-09-4422.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) document (2009a). Building your program using family psychoeducation. http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA09-4423/BuildingYourProgram-FP.pdf was retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA09-4423/BuildingYourProgram-FP.pdf (PDF)
Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. HHS Pub. No. SMA-09-4422.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) document (2009e). Frontline employees are being trained in family psychoeducation. http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/TrainingFrontlineStaff-FP.pdf was retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/TrainingFrontlineStaff-FP.pdf (PDF)
Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. HHS Pub. No. SMA-09-4422.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) document (2009d). The evidence for family psychoeducation. http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/TheEvidence-FP.pdf was retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/TheEvidence-FP.pdf (PDF)
Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. HHS Pub. No. SMA-09-4422.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) document (2009b). Evaluating your program of family psychoeducation. http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/EvaluatingYourProgram-FP.pdf was retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA09-4423/EvaluatingYourProgram-FP.pdf (PDF)
Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. HHS Pub. No. SMA-09-4422.
Note: This will come in handy in the coming weeks when you construct an evaluation strategy.
Evidence-Based Practices Resources
Promising Practices Network is a network of promising practices (n. d.). Programs that are effective. http://www.promisingpractices.net/programs indicator list.asp?indicatorid=7 (accessed October 8, 2013).
Promising Practices Network is a network of promising practices (n. d.). In a nutshell, research http://www.promisingpractices.net/issuebriefs.asp (accessed November 12, 2013).
Gateway to Child Welfare Information (n.d.). Child abuse prevention that is based on scientific evidence. https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/preventing/evidence/
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) is a federal agency that deals with substance abuse and mental (2012). A road map for putting evidence-based programs into action. http://web.archive.org/web/20151010063916/http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/Courses/Implementations/resources/imp course.pdf retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20151010063916/http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/Courses/Implementations/resources/imp course.pdf
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (for review) (2018). A resource center for evidence-based approaches. https://www.samhsa.gov/ebp-resource-center/index.html
The Campbell Collaboration is a group of people that work together to create something (n. d.). www.campbellcollaboration.org, retrieved on October 8, 2013.
Media Requirements
Education at the Laureate (Producer). (2013c). [Video file] Episode 2 of the Levy family. https://class.waldenu.edu/retrieved
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!