Gene doping and anti-doping regulations
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Gene doping and anti-doping regulations
Gene doping is the practice of altering an individual’s DNA in order to enhance their athletic performance. This is accomplished through techniques such as gene transfer, where genes are inserted into an individual’s cells, or gene therapy, where a person’s existing genes are altered. The use of gene doping is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) because it goes against the principles of fair play and is considered to be unethical.
Anti-doping regulations are put in place to ensure that athletes compete on a level playing field and to prevent the use of performance-enhancing drugs. These regulations are enforced by WADA, which is responsible for creating the World Anti-Doping Code (Code) and ensuring that it is followed by athletes, sports organizations, and governments around the world. The Code contains a list of prohibited substances and methods, as well as the consequences for breaking these rules.
One of the key elements of anti-doping regulations is testing. Athletes are subject to both in-competition and out-of-competition testing, and they can be tested for a variety of performance-enhancing substances, including steroids, human growth hormone, and blood doping agents. If an athlete tests positive for a prohibited substance, they can face sanctions, including fines, suspension from competition, and the forfeiture of medals or titles.
Another important aspect of anti-doping regulation is education. WADA is dedicated to educating athletes and the public about the dangers of performance-enhancing drugs and the importance of fair play in sport. The agency provides resources and information to athletes, coaches, and other members of the sporting community, and it works to raise awareness about the negative impact that performance-enhancing drugs can have on an individual’s health and on the integrity of sport.
While anti-doping regulations have been successful in reducing the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sport, the development of new technologies and methods has made it more difficult to detect and prevent cheating. This has led to a growing concern about the use of gene doping, which is still in its early stages of development and is not yet well understood.
In response to the threat posed by gene doping, WADA has taken steps to address this new challenge. The agency has established a research program to investigate the science of gene doping and to develop new methods for detecting it. Additionally, WADA has updated the Code to include provisions that specifically address gene doping, making it clear that the use of performance-enhancing genetic manipulations is prohibited.
In conclusion, gene doping and anti-doping regulations are important for maintaining the integrity of sport and ensuring that athletes compete on a level playing field. WADA is dedicated to preventing the use of performance-enhancing drugs and is taking steps to address the emerging threat posed by gene doping. Through education, research, and strong enforcement, WADA is working to promote fairness and health in sport and to uphold the values of clean competition.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Gene doping and anti-doping regulations
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!