Gender Stereotyping and Achievement Gap Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Gender Stereotyping and Achievement Gap Essay
Gender serotyping predetermines an atmosphere of failure because of language barriers socioeconomic problems, and gender,
The achievement gaps which have affected me personally is cognitive retention, poor grades, and social-emotional issues, because of my sons with learning challenges. The solution was homeschooling and finding programs which could help to reverse the problem, which are low test scores, poor grades, and low self-esteem.
The stereotyping towards the male gender is that because of race, and the economic problem there was very little help or optimism to solve the problem (Educational Psychologist, 2005).
However, with persistence, the outcome is that one son graduated high school at the age of fifteen because of positive interventions, and the other son is computer network engineer for a prestigious college.
Today, I work with families with children of male and female gender who have poor test scores, poor cognitive skill, and other learning and behavior challenges. (Educational Psychologist, 2005).
The gaps in academic achievement are caused by various factors such as gender difference, non-cognitive skills, motivation, socioeconomic problems, genetics, biological causes and environmental influences (Reis & Park, 2001).
In elementary schools, girls usually perform better in languages and boys in languages in mathematics. The method to measure achievement gaps in regards to cognitive abilities and neurological function are intelligence testing, standardized test scores, and GPAs. The socioeconomic status determines the resources which are available to improve the student’s cognitive abilities.
Non-cognitive skills, affect the quality of life, social skills in children and adolescence. The early learning program such as head start and other programs can determine that children with cognitive problems who are behind the other children in social skills, fine motor, gross motor, and social-emotional development capabilities.
The areas are which require cognitive perception, are math, and reading application, and picture recognition and clarification concepts. The children lack conscientiousness, impulse control, and cognitive focus.
The objective is to improve cognitive skills in the male and female gender for academic success, self-fulfillment, employment opportunities, and increase socioeconomic status in later life (Helgeson, 2017).
The gaps occur because of biological, environmental and socioeconomic factors. However, middle class and upper-class families also may have children with non-cognitive issues but are able to engage their children to improve skills with programs such as; social-emotional programs, art, music, dance programs, interpersonal skill, self-regulatory skills, independence motivation, and thus improve cognitive functions.
The outcome from restructuring the curriculum, teacher’s training in social-emotional problems, cognitive skills to improved behavior, retention, and fewer gaps in academic success (Throndsen & Turmo, 2012).
The outcome is that children cognitive functions improve and become emotionally well rounded, less frustration, and have improved well-being (Helgeson, 2017).
References
Educational Psychologist, (2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance. WIN; 40; 1; p53-p63, Database: Social Sciences Citation Index
Helgeson, V. S. (2017). Psychology of gender (5th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Reis, S. M.; Park, S. (2001). Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and science. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p52-73, 22p, Database: Education Source
Throndsen, I. Turmo, A. (2012). Gender Differences in Teachers Beliefs and Primary School Children’s Achievements in Mathematics. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, Vol. 39, p159-170, 12p, 3 Charts. Publisher: Scientific Methodical Center Scientia Educologica.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!