Food sovereignty and community empowerment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Food sovereignty and community empowerment
Food sovereignty is a term that has emerged in recent years to describe a social movement that advocates for the right of individuals and communities to control their own food systems. This includes the right to decide what crops to grow, how to grow them, and how they will be distributed and consumed. Food sovereignty is often contrasted with the dominant model of food production and distribution, which is based on large-scale industrial agriculture and controlled by a small number of multinational corporations.
The concept of food sovereignty arose in response to the challenges faced by small-scale farmers and rural communities around the world. These challenges include the impact of globalization on local economies, the concentration of power in the hands of agribusiness corporations, and the loss of traditional knowledge and practices related to food production and preparation. Food sovereignty seeks to address these issues by promoting the development of sustainable and locally based food systems that are rooted in community control.
At the heart of the food sovereignty movement is the idea that food is not just a commodity, but a fundamental human right. By asserting control over their food systems, communities can ensure that they have access to healthy and culturally appropriate food, and that their food systems are environmentally sustainable and socially just. Food sovereignty is about much more than just food production, however. It is also about building social and political relationships that support community autonomy and self-determination.
One of the key ways that food sovereignty is promoted is through the development of local food systems. These can take many forms, from community gardens and farmers markets to cooperative grocery stores and food hubs. By supporting local food production and distribution, food sovereignty advocates seek to reduce the environmental impact of food transportation, build community resilience and self-reliance, and promote the use of sustainable farming practices.
Another important aspect of food sovereignty is the promotion of agroecology. Agroecology is a holistic approach to farming that seeks to mimic natural ecosystems and promote biodiversity. This includes techniques such as intercropping, crop rotation, and the use of cover crops to build soil fertility and reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Agroecology also emphasizes the use of traditional knowledge and practices, as well as the integration of livestock and other animals into farming systems.
Food sovereignty is also closely linked to issues of social justice and human rights. In many countries, small-scale farmers and indigenous communities are marginalized and excluded from decision-making processes related to food production and distribution. Food sovereignty advocates seek to empower these communities by promoting their participation in local food systems and advocating for policies that support their rights to land and resources.
One of the challenges facing the food sovereignty movement is the dominance of the global food system by large corporations and multinational organizations. These entities wield significant political and economic power, and often work against the interests of small-scale farmers and local communities. However, by building strong networks of solidarity and promoting alternative food systems, food sovereignty advocates are making progress in building a more sustainable and equitable food future.
In conclusion, food sovereignty is a powerful concept that offers a vision for a more just and sustainable food system. By promoting community control over food systems, supporting local food production and distribution, and advocating for the rights of small-scale farmers and marginalized communities, food sovereignty advocates are working to build a world where everyone has access to healthy and culturally appropriate food, and where food production is sustainable and socially just.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Food sovereignty and community empowerment
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!