Finance Analysis Assignment Essay 

 Finance Analysis Assignment Essay

Description/Paper Instructions

Finance Analysis Assignment Essay

This case describes the latest restructuring efforts by Deutsche Bank (DB). In July 2019, Christian Sewing, the new CEO of DB, announced a series of measures that included, among others, the elimination of global equity trading, the layoff of 18,000 employees, the creation of a “bad bank” to transfer non-core assets, and the suspension of dividends until 2022. The case describes key decisions a bank CEO must make when a bank needs to change course to return to profitability and growth. The case puts the students in the CEO’s shoes: What would you do and why? The case also describes key banking performance metrics (e.g., ROE, ROA) and other critical variables such as those reflecting capital health (Tier 1 ratio), as well as gives an overview of the bank business model and factors impacting bank profitability and value.

Q1 and Q2 refer to the data and period presented in the UVA/Darden Case

(Reminder: I will deduct points if you do not support your answer with empirical evidence/data from the Darden case. Make clear references to the case information, Figures, and Exhibits.)

Q1. Why has Sewing put forth yet another restructuring plan for DB? Do you agree with Sewing’s plan? Why or why not?

Q2. Deciding what to cut and how much to cut is not straightforward. What indicators is Sewing considering for his decision? What might be the repercussions of such a decision for DB?

[Q1 + Q2: 1.5 pages write-up max]

After reading the case, use Thomson Reuters or Bloomberg databases to collect updated data on DB. Specifically, please provide an Excel file with the following updates:

-Figure 1, Exhibit 4, Exhibit 6, Exhibit 7 (only P/TBV for DB and peers) for the years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022.

– Exhibit 3, only for the year 2022.

The Excel file must contain the underlying data you use to create the updated Figure 1, Exhibit 3, Exhibit 4, Exhibit 6, and Exhibit 7 (i.e., data + charts, not just a screenshot of the charts). Furthermore, indicate the source of the data you are using. Use Thomson Reuters, Bloomberg, or public company filings. Do NOT use WRDS, Yahoo Finance, Statist,  or other sources. Note: updated numbers may be slightly different from the case, but they should not be substantially different. Trends should be similar. Report all financial variables in USD currency, paying close attention to the conversion exchange rates for non-US companies. If data is missing in Thomson Reuters or Bloomberg, please refer to public filings.

After you have updated the figures and exhibits, go to FT.com or WSJ.com and search for the latest news about DB. For instance, you can use the search function within the FT.com website and type the keywords liDeutschesche bank”.

Based on the updated figures, exhibits, and press research, answer the following questions:

3a) What do the historical financials tell us about Deutsche Bank’s profitability ratios in terms of ROA/ROE for the past three or four years? How does/did Deutsche Bank’s profitability compare to its peers? Is the restructuring plan working? Explain similarities/differences (pre vs. post-restructuring plans) and the financial data you downloaded to support your findings.

3b) What are the big issues Deutsche Bank is dealing with today? What can the bank’s management do/how is it performing? What would you advise (in comparison to management’s current performance) and why? Support your opinion and advice with YOUR data analysis.

3c) DB share price tumbled in the last month, especially after March 9, 2023, and then again after March 21. During that period, we saw the SVB blowup, the Credit Suisse acquisition by UBS, and the subsequent volatility around DB shares. What similarities and differences can you draw between the three banks (SVB, Credit Suisse, and DB)?

[Q3: 1.5 pages write-up max]

Write-up instructions

In answering the questions, your group must take a position and express an opinion. You must support your opinion with facts, theory, and empirical evidence. I want to see numbers! Be aware: Numbers alone do not tell a story. You must analyze the numbers and tell a story around them.

Please use the assigned readings when answering your questions. Do not use blogs, Wikipedia, Investopedia, etc. If you need to refer to an article, use only the FT, WSJ, or the Economist as sources for your research when expressing your opinion. I will deduct points if: 1) you do not support your answer with empirical evidence/data; and 2) you use sources such as blogs, Wikipedia, Investopedia, or press articles outside the FT, WS, J, or the Economist.

Your sources must be properly cited in the bibliography. Using someone else’s wording without quotation marks is considered plagiarism.

In general, I expect each answer to be supported by data analysis. Show your work and refer to the numbers (including the number page where they can be found) used in your analysis to support your opinion and statements.

Finance Analysis Assignment Essay

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!