Film the Technological Film History Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Film the Technological Film History Essay
F/TV 2B: HISTORY OF CINEMA (1950-Present)
De Anza College
Christina Wright, instructorRESEARCH OR ANALYTICAL PAPER GUIDELINES
This assignment gives you an opportunity to explore an area of film history—between 1950 and today—that interests you. Topic possibilities and approaches are numerous.
RESEARCH PAPER: This focuses on some aspect of film history with emphasis on research using published material. Proper citations and complete bibliography of source materials are REQUIRED. Read “What is plagiarism?”: http://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism.
Also read “What Is Citation?”: http://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-citation. Follow the in-text citation style of MLA (Modern Language Association): https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/m… ext_citations_the_basics.html
Also adhere to the MLA guidelines for the Works Cited page: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/m… ks_cited_page_basic_format.html
Documentation MUST be complete, and citations (including endnotes or footnotes and Works Cited or Bibliography) MUST be in an acceptable format to receive credit for this paper. FIVE (5) or more SCHOLARLY references are required. Beware of inaccurate information on Internet sites, including the open-source Wikipedia, a non-scholarly source.
If this is your first Film Studies class, I recommend that you write a research paper. GENERAL TOPIC AREAS:
Technological Film History: technical developments that changed the course of film history and their
impact on the artistic process, such as widescreen formats, color, 3-D, and virtual reality; technological
and aesthetic influences upon the development of deep-focus cinematography; the deterioration and preservation of color films; special effects in the cinema; sound; digital technology and the cinema.Industrial Film History: film financing; marketing, distribution and exhibition; labor relations in Hollywood; corporate studios and vertical integration; product placement in feature films; the San Francisco Bay Area motion picture industry; current state of independent production; the new studios such as Netflix, Amazon and Hulu.
Social Film History: McCarthyism in Hollywood; censorship and the movies; the image of minority groups such as African Americans, Latinos, American Indians, Asians, women or LGBTQ; social problems as depicted on film (racial or ethnic prejudice, alcoholism, drug use, crime); image studies (depiction of the Vietnam War on film, politics on film; 9/11 on film); the effects of film on viewer behavior and attitude; film as a reflection of psychological and cultural identity; the star image and cult of celebrity.
Aesthetic Film History: realism vs. formalism; auteur theory; psychoanalysis and the cinema; neoformalism; Marxist critique; mythologies; feminist approaches; genre study (Western, comedy, musical, science fiction, horror, drama); movements (Italian neorealism, French New Wave, Dogme95).
Film History Research: compile an annotated list of scholarly film websites and/or databases on the Internet. Address their strengths and weaknesses, as well as how you assessed their credibility. Consider categorizing the material according to domain name suffix (com, edu, gov, mil, net, org).
BIOGRAPHIES ARE UNACCEPTABLE.
Please contact me if you need more specific topic ideas within the general areas suggested.
ANALYTICAL PAPER: This paper demands thinking, defining and supporting your ideas about a specific film topic. Developing and communicating a critical judgment in writing is much more difficult than sharing an opinion in casual conversation. You may need to do some research and documentation in connection with your paper. This option is available only to those who have already completed at least one Film Studies course.
GENERAL TOPIC AREAS:
Themes: loss of individuality and fear of technology in science fiction films; inability to vanquish evil in contemporary horror films; the political, mythological or psychological implications of a film such as Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, The Golden Compass, District 9, The Hunger Games or Her; the impact of consumerist culture (American Beauty, Fight Club); unabashed patriotism or distrust of authority (Blackhawk Down and We Were Soldiers vs. Spartan; The Bourne Ultimatum and In the Valley of Elah; Argo and Zero Dark Thirty; American Sniper); the political or cultural activism of films such as Good Night, and Good Luck, Crash, Brokeback Mountain, Babel, Milk, 12 Years A Slave or The Post; LBGTQ issues in films such as Glen or Glenda, The Crying Game, Boys Don’t Cry, All About My Mother, Transamerica, The Danish Girl, Carol or Moonlight; analysis of the themes of any current release.
Characterization: antiheroes in film noir; alienated youth in American films of the late 1960s; comic book heroes on film; explosive white male as depicted in Falling Down, The Bad Lieutenant, 187, The Funeral, Fight Club or The Master; female action heroes as depicted in La Femme Nikita, The Long Kiss Goodnight, The Matrix, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, The Hunger Games or Wonder Woman.
Form: anti-traditional stylistics in film noir; French New Wave techniques in The 400 Blows; influence of music video, videogames and commercials on feature film style; the new narratives and fractured time of Jim Jarmusch, Julie Dash, Quentin Tarantino, John Sayles, Tom Tykwer, Steven Soderbergh, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Wong Kar-Wai or Christopher Nolan; Peter Greenaway, Mike Figgis, Michael Haneke or Richard Linklater’s experiments with film form and theory; the aesthetics of cell phone-made films.
Comparison and contrast: remakes such as Breathless, Funny Games, Infernal Affairs or The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo; a film adaptation of a literary work such as Dracula, The Hours, The Pianist, No Country for Old Men, The Perks of Being A Wallflower, Life of Pi or If Beale Street Could Talk; a film adaptation of a graphic novel; two directors with commonalities, such as Ingmar Bergman and Woody Allen; two similar films from different periods, such as a French New Wave film and Frances Ha.
Genre groupings: plots, conventions and iconography of a specific genre.
Auteur groupings: 2-3 films by the same director, cinematographer or screenwriter.
Emerging trends: Films set in and/or created by emerging Oakland-San Francisco filmmakers (writer- director Ryan Coogler/Fruitvale Station and Black Panther; writer-director-composer Boots Riley/Sorry to Bother You; producer-writer-actor Daveed Diggs/Blindspotting; producer-writer-director Peter Nicks/The Waiting Room and The Force; writer-director Joe Talbot/The Last Black Man in San Francisco, among others); Films exploring our relationship with technology, particularly with Artificial Intelligence.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!