Federal Junk Food and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax to Improve Diet
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Federal Junk Food and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax to Improve Diet
1
Abdulrhmaan Baroun
October 9,2018
“Legal and Administrative Feasibility of a Federal Junk Food and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax to Improve Diet” is an article by Pomeranz et al. that looks into the poor feeding habits and how a tax on junk food including sugar-sweetened drinks can help to address the matter. As such, the authors engage in a research that seeks ways and suggestions that can help to discourage poor diet for a healthy one (Pomeranz et al., 2018). The underlying concern in the article is the poor diet that is leading to lifestyle diseases such as diabetes 1 and 2. The authors argue that unhealthy diet can be reduced through the ratification of policies that dictate the pricing of food and drinks. By this, Promeranza and peers argue the need for taxation of unhealthy food and beverages and introducing incentives on healthy food and drinks.
According to Pomeranz et al (2018), local taxes on sweetened products have gained popularity and political acceptance. The methodology of the article includes reviewing historical data to identify existing justification concerning prospective methods for a federal junk tax. The literature contributes by availing information concerning the classification of food as junk, which according to the author would help to identify the right type of tax. In addition, the data on taxes that have been imposed on food and drinks in the past helps the researchers to assess the rate of success of the proposed assumption.
The literature review includes the use of peer-reviewed journals. These resources provide the researchers with in-depth discussions, which target products for junk food taxes and are guided by keywords such as tax, nutrient, unhealthy, snack, product, and energy dense (Pomeranz et al., 2018). However, literature that discusses fast food taxes and beverage product taxes are not included under this category. The article also includes a number of evaluations on the historical data, which is listed under the ‘selection of policies.’ The researchers look at the policies made by the United States and international policies on tax as well. The scientific review of literature on this section comprises the use of articles that meets the criteria of recommended tax and product classification. This literature commends the use of product category, broad nutrition standards, specific nutrients or calories, and a mixture of these methods to categorize foods to be taxed.
The study reveals the practicability of enforcing federal taxes on junk food. The study is supported by a definition of taxed products in a number of factors. The literatures examined by the researchers offer a number of considerations that could be used in offering an explanation of the identified metrics for labeling taxed food products. The comparison made by the researchers offers a combination of group and nutrition criteria, which maintains the various advantages of a class tax in a way when addressing the established limitations. The purpose of the study stands as it is backed by historical evidence that supports the notion of enforcing national taxes on junk food and drinks (Pomeranz et al., 2018). National tax enforcement would help to influence the consumer’s purchase decisions as they would opt for the healthier products that have attractive incentives on them.
The strengths of the study include its approach of evaluating different sources of evidence. These resources include scientific literature, federal taxing methods, US bills and laws, as well as international laws. The limitations of the study include its inability to capture all significant bills and laws. It also fails to analyze the practicability of evaluating a tax straightforwardly on sugar processors and refiners.
Reference
Pomeranz, J., Wilde, P., Huang, Y., Micha, R., & Mozaffarian, D. (February, 2018). Legal and Administrative Feasibility of a Federal Junk Food and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax to Improve Diet. AJPH Law & Ethics, Vol. 108, No. 2.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!