Feature Selection for Multimedia Analysis
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Feature Selection for Multimedia Analysis
- Yang Y, Ma Z, Hauptmann AG, Sebe N (2012) Feature selection for multimedia analysis by sharing information among multiple tasks. IEEE Trans Multimed 15(3):661–669
- Yang Y, Nie F, Xu D, Luo J, Zhuang Y, Pan Y (2012) A multimedia retrieval framework based on semi- supervised ranking and relevance feedback. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell (TPAMI) 34(5):723–742
- Yang Y, Song J, Huang Z, Ma Z, Sebe N, Hauptmann AG (2013) Multi-feature fusion via hierarchical regression for multimedia analysis. IEEE Trans Multimedia 15(3):572–58
Multimed Tools Appl (2016) 75:9169–9184 9181
- Yang Y, Zhuang Y, Wu F, Pan Y (2008) Harmonizing hierarchical manifolds for multimedia document semantics understanding and cross-media retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 10(3):437–446
- Yu Z, Wu F, Yang Y, Tian Q, Luo J, Zhuang Y (2014) Discriminative coupled dictionary hashing for fast cross-media retrieval. SIGIR, 395–404
- Zhang H, Liu Y, Ma Z (2013) Fusing inherent and external knowledge with nonlinear learning for cross- media retrieval. Neurocomputing 119:10–16
- Zhang H, Wu P, Beck A, Zhang Z, Gao X (2016) Adaptive incremental learning of image semantics with application to social robot. Neurocomputing 173:93–101
- Zhang H, Yu J, Wang M, Liu Y (2012) Semi-supervised distance metric learning based on local linear regression for data clustering. Neurocomputing 93:100–105
- Zhang H, Yuan J, Gao X, Chen Z (2014) Boosting cross-media retrieval via visual-auditory feature analysis and relevance feedback. ACM International Conference on Multimedia
- Zhuang Y, Yang Y, Wu F (2008) Mining semantic correlation of heterogeneous multimedia data for cross- media retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 10(2):221–229
Hong Zhang corresponding author, received the BS degree from Wuhan University of Technology, China, in 2001, the MS degree from Wuhan University of Technology, China, in 2004, and PhD degree from Zhejiang University, China, in 2007. She is currently a professor in the college of computer science and technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, China. Her research interests include content-based multimedia analysis, machine learning and cross-media retrieval.
Wenping Zhang is currently a master student in the college of computer science and technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, China. He received his BS degree from Huazhong Agricultural University Chutian College, China, in 2014. His research interests include machine learning and data mining.
9182 Multimed Tools Appl (2016) 75:9169–9184
Wenhe Liu received the Ms. Degree in Artificial Intelligence from The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2012. He is now a Ph.D.student with The Centre for Quantum Computation & Intelligent Systems (QCIS), the University of Technology, Sydney (UTS), Sydney, Australia. His research interests include machine learning and its applications to multimedia and computer vision.
Xin Xu received the Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. He is a lecturer in the School of Computer Science and Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. His current research interests include computer vision, pattern recognition, and visual surveillance.
Multimed Tools Appl (2016) 75:9169–9184 9183
Hehe Fan received the Master degree of Computer Architecture from Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China, in 2015. His research interests include distributed computing, parallel processing and machine learning. Hehe Fan is currently a Research and Development Engineer in Baidu Inc.
9184 Multimed Tools Appl (2016) 75:9169–9184
Multimedia Tools & Applications is a copyright of Springer, 2016. All Rights Reserved.
Multiple kernel visual-auditory representation learning for retrieval
Abstract
Introduction
Related works
Cross-media retrieval
Multiple kernel distance metric learning
Discussion
Multiple kernel visual-auditory representation learning
Visual-auditory kernel canonical correlation analysis and mapping
Extension to multiple kernel visual-auditory analysis
Experiments
Experimental setup
Performance comparison results
Performance evaluation of new media objects
Conclusions
References
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!