FCSC 101 Ethical Considerations in Research Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
FCSC 101 Ethical Considerations in Research Paper
there are 3 task of this assignment
this is the first one:
FCSC-101-M07
Ethical Considerations in Research • Writing assignment
Due Wednesday, April 8th 2020
In class this week, we learned about several studies that, in hindsight, raise considerable ethical concerns (at the time, such ethical considerations were not observed). It is critical that we, as scientists, researchers, and scholars, question our assumptions, study practices, and how these may impact the individuals we interact with when conducting scientific investigations or experiments. As a result of studies like the ones we have been discussing, in 1979, the Belmont Report made recommendations about how research must be conducted. Today, all research involving human participants must be approved by an ethics review board (institutional review board or IRB) that protects the rights of research participants.
In reflecting upon your learning and discussions from this week, I would like you to dig deeper into the history of science/psychology to find another example of an unethical experiment. You can use any sources that you feel are appropriate for this assignment, but you must state where you found the information.
Title of the study (e.g., “the Tuskegee study”, “HeLa”, “Three identical strangers”, “the Stanford prison experiment”):
Where did you find the information about this study? Check all that apply:
Internet
Book
Newspaper/magazine article(s)
Movie/YouTube
Other
Please specify:
(1 point)
- In no more than one paragraph (three to four sentences), please describe the experiment. Try to bracket your own views, thoughts and perceptions,about what the experiment was about to provide your reader with an unbiased description. Do not say that the experiment was unethical, use language free of bias (e.g., do use words like “clearly”, “obviously”). Use in-text references when/where appropriate. (5 points)
- In two to threesentences, explain what stood out for you about why this study was unethical. (1 point)
- Answer the following questions. Use full sentences (but you may bullet point each sentence, i.e., your responseto these questions does not need to comprisecoherent paragraph). (5 points)
- What other factors do you think made this study unethical?
- Why do you think the participant(s) agreed to participate in the study?
- (if applicable) How long did the study go on for?
- (if applicable) Who provided funding for this study?
- What did the scientists who conducted the study think that they would find out?
- Why do you think that the scientists felt justified in carrying out the study?
- What practices are in place today that would prevent such a study from occurring today, or in the future? (please list at least one standard/practice/regulation/etc.These may be from the IRB.). (3 points)
First two PDF are the second work u need to do
last three PDF are the third work u need to do
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!