Explain 5 Roles of The Case Manager
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Explain 5 Roles of The Case Manager
Chapter 25
Case Management
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1
Define continuity of care, care management, case management, care coordination, population health management, transitional care, integrated care, social determinants of health, and advocacy.
Describe the scope of practice, roles, and functions of a case manager.
Compare and contrast the nursing process with processes of case management and advocacy.
Objectives (1 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2
2
Identify methods to manage conflict, as well as the process of achieving collaboration.
Define and explain the legal and ethical issues confronting case managers.
Objectives (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
3
3
Population management
Social mandate
Care management
Utilization management
Critical pathways
Disease management
Demand management
Definitions
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
4
4
Case management and the nursing process
Characteristics and roles
Knowledge and skill requisites
Tools of case managers
Historical evidence
Contemporary evidence
Concepts of Case Management
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
5
5
Assessment
Diagnosis
Planning for outcomes
Implementation
Evaluation
Case Management and the Nursing Process
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
6
See Table 25.1, The Nursing Process and Case Management.
6
Case Management Roles
Broker
Consultant
Coordinator
Educator
Facilitator
Liaison
Mentor
Monitor/reporter
Negotiator
Client advocate
Researcher
Standardization monitor
Systems allocator
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
7
See Box 25.1, Case Manager Roles, for descriptions of these roles.
7
Factors That Demand Case Management Attention
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
8
Fig. 25.4: Factors that require the attention of the nurse and client in the case management process
8
Knowledge and Skill Requisites
Standards of practice for case management
Evidence-based practice guidelines
Knowledge of the health care financial environment
Clinical knowledge, skill, and maturity
Care resources
Transition planning
Management skills
Teaching, counseling, and education skills
Program evaluation and research
Performance improvement techniques
Peer consultation and evaluation
Requirements of eligibility and benefit parameters by third-party payers
Legal and ethical issues
Information management systems
Health care legislation/policy
Technical information skills
Outcomes management and applied research
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
9
See Box 25.2 for an expanded list of knowledge and skill requisites.
9
Six “rights” of case management
Right care
Right time
Right provider
Right setting
Right price/value
Right outcomes
Tools of Case Managers (1 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
10
10
Three tools
Case management plans
Standards of client care and nursing practice
Clinical guidelines
Evidence-based practices
Critical path development gave way to care maps
Disease management
Focus: the natural progression of a disease in high-risk populations
Life care planning
Needs of a client for catastrophic or chronic disease over a life span
Technology driven
Tools of Case Managers (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
11
Technology supports the delivery of processes used by the case manager. The technology sector is refining software in the areas of documentation, decision support, dashboard tools, predictive modeling, workflow automation, reporting capabilities, electronic health records, patient engagement strategies and social media, and remote monitoring.
11
Historical evidence
Taylor’s three models
Client focused
System focused
Social service
Contemporary evidence
Model of intensive case management (ICM)
Kolbasovshy (2009)
Reduced readmissions
CARE ONE program: reduced emergency room (ER) visits
2012 Study: decreased acute outpatient and inpatient admissions
Evidence-Based Examples of Case Management
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
12
Client-focused models are concerned with the relationship between case manager and client to support continuity of care and to access providers of care.
System-focused models, in contrast, address the structure and processes of using the population-based tools of disease management and case management plans to offer care for client populations.
The social service models provide services to clients to assist them in living independently in the community and in maintaining their health by eliminating or reducing the need for hospital admissions or long-term care.
These models offer a solution to unnecessary health care expenses by reducing costs and accessing appropriate health care services.
12
Which model demonstrated a consistent reduction in ER visits, readmissions, and acute outpatient and inpatient admissions in multiple studies?
Social service
Client-focused
System-focused
Intensive case management
Quick Recall (1 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
13
13
Answer is D.
Intensive case management
Quick Recall (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
14
Model of intensive case management (ICM)
Reduced readmissions
Reduced ER visits
Reduced acute outpatient and inpatient admissions
How’d You Do?
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
15
Advocacy
Conflict management
Collaboration
Essential Skills for Case Managers
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
16
16
The advocacy role aims to achieve patient engagement.
By helping patients become invested in their health and care through programs that provide information and tools to empower them to take control and evaluate their care
Advocacy (1 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
17
The definition of nursing includes advocacy: “Nursing is the protection, promotion and optimization of health and abilities, prevention of illness and injury, alleviation of suffering through the diagnosis and treatment of human response, and advocacy in the care of individuals, families, communities and populations” (ANA, 2010).
17
Process of advocacy
Promoting self-determination in clients
Informing:
Amplifying
Clarifying
Verifying
Supporting
Affirming
Illuminating values
Advocacy (2 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
18
Amplifying occurs between the nurse and the client to assess the needs and demands that will eventually frame the client’s decision. Information is exchanged from both viewpoints.
Clarifying is a process in which the nurse and client strive to understand meanings in a common way.
Verifying is the process used by the nurse advocate to establish accuracy and reality.
The second major process, supporting, involves upholding a client’s right to make a choice and to act on it.
The third process in the advocacy role is affirming. It is based on an advocate’s belief that a client’s decision is consistent with the client’s values and goals.
18
Allocation roles in nursing
Triage
Gatekeeping
Rationing
Systems-level demands
Budget decisions
Staffing assignments
Clinical level demands
Implementing treatment protocols
Advocacy can conflict with allocation.
Limited resources contribute to this conflict.
Allocation and Advocacy
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
19
19
Negotiation outcomes
Distributive outcomes
One party gains
Integrative outcomes
Mutual advantages override individual gains
Negotiation stages
Prenegotiating
Negotiating
Aftermath
Conflict Management
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
20
Negotiating is a strategic process used to move conflicting parties toward an outcome. The outcome can vary from one in which one party gains benefit at the other’s expense (distributive outcomes) or in which mutual advantages override individual gains (integrative outcomes).
20
Establish issues and agenda.
Advance demands and uncover interests.
Bargain and discover new options.
Work out an agreement.
Negotiation Phases
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
21
21
Communication is essential but not sufficient.
Joint decision making valued
However, one member should be accountable.
Handling competing expectations
Collaboration (1 of 2)
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
22
22
Collaboration (2 of 2)
Goal: to amplify, clarify, and verify all team members’ points of view
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
23
23
Legal issues
Ethical issues
Issues in Case Management
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
24
24
Liability for managing care
Negligent referrals
Experimental treatment and technology
Confidentiality/security
Fraud and abuse
Legal Issues
Copyright © 2020 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
25
25
Autonomy
Beneficence
Fidelity
Justice
Nonmaleficence
Veracity
Ethical Issues
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!