Evaluation of the Project Management Plan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Evaluation of the Project Management Plan
Complete the Executive Summary, Risk Management Plan, Project Quality Plan, and Project Close and Lessons Learned sections of the Project Management Plan form.
Introduction
This portfolio work project entails completing the Project Management Plan form and submitting the Project Schedule for the following components:Summary of the report
For higher management to understand how the project supports the organization’s mission and goals, a concise overview of the project’s purpose, important points, and deliverables is provided.
Plan for Risk Management.
This section discusses the risk management plan’s purpose in relation to the project you’ve chosen.
Plan for Project Quality.
This is the method and activities used to ensure that a project’s product, services, and outcomes meet or exceed quality expectations. Activities to review project requirements are included in this section.
The project has come to an end, and we’ve learned some valuable lessons.
This gives you a place to think about project standards and best practices. What are the top three work-related lessons you’ve learned?
Scenario
Option A or Option B should be used for this examination. It is not necessary to perform both.Option A: Complete the remaining four components of your project management strategy and project schedule with Cosmo, Inc. For further details, see the Cosmo, Inc. Business Case document.
Option B: Complete the final four sections of your project management strategy and project schedule with a project from your own company.
Your Function
As the project manager, you’re in charge of putting together a detailed Project Management Plan and Project Schedule to help your business stakeholders make informed decisions and ensure a successful project execution.Requirements
Use the Project Plan Template to create the final portions of your Project Management Plan for Options A or B, as mentioned in the assessment Introduction. Include the following in your list:Create a detailed Executive Summary section that includes high-level information such as the problem(s), solution(s), timeline, budget, risks, and so on.
Create a component of your Risk Management plan that includes an introduction, a risk legend, and a risk matrix.
Develop a detailed Quality Management plan section that includes information on each process group’s tools and practices.
Describe the elements that contributed to the project’s success and the lessons learnt. Include a few postmortem best practices and the top three lessons learned in the Project Close and Lessons Learned section.
Deliverable Format
Use the Project Management Plan Template to get started.
References: This assessment does not require a certain amount of references. When possible, use scholarly or academic sources.
The Project Management Plan is a professional document, so it should be formatted according to the MBA Academic and Professional Document Guidelines, which include single-spaced paragraphs. Make sure to include the link in the plan’s template’s project schedule section.
For references and in-text citations, use the APA style and structure.
Length: Follow the template’s instructions, including the title and reference pages.
Evaluation
You will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies by successfully completing this assessment using the scoring guide criteria:Analyze project management approaches and frameworks (Competency 1).
Create a section for the executive summary.
Competency 2: Examine the benefits of project management to the organization.
Describe the elements that contributed to the project’s success and the lessons learnt.
Competency 3: Examine how various project management frameworks are used.
Create a section for risk management.
Analysis of how leadership attributes and behaviors affect project quality and success is competency #4.
Create a section for Quality Management.
Competency 5: Share project management requirements, opportunities, and strategies with a variety of stakeholders.
Communicate in a professional and consistent manner with the expectations of project management professionals.
Using the grading guide and delivering feedback, your course instructor will provide feedback as if he or she were the recipient of your deliverables at work. Before submitting this assessment, check the Project Management Plan scoring guide to make sure you meet the grading standards.ePortfolio
This work project for your portfolio exhibits your ability to use knowledge and abilities learned as an MBA student in the workplace. This activity should be saved to your ePortfolio for future use in the workplace.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!