Evaluation of Morals and Ethics Argumentative Essay
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Evaluation of Morals and Ethics Argumentative Essay
Evaluation, Morals, Ethics, Argumentative, Essay
Some suggestions to get started:
REVIEW
First, review the readings. Use what you have learned from these readings as a basis for your own argument. When I say “as a basis,” I mean as support for your own claim. Your claim may be similar to other ethical positions, but it is still yours. Use your own ideas and examples to support your claim. Make your argument unique to you and avoid merely restating or summarizing what others have said. Use resources as support for your argument–as back up.
CONTEXT
You are being asked to argue for an obligation that is ethical or right–for the common good. In our society, determining what is morally or ethically right is often confusing and opinionated or personal. Our society is struggling in this way. Thus, the need for strong reasoning in the service for what is right. In a culture that is confused about what or how to value the natural world, we need strong claims for values. We need to be convinced of the best principles. If we ask others to honor, respect, protect, or conserve the natural world, we must be able to provide really strong reasons for doing so.
BASIS
For Leopold, the reasons to love and respect and protect the natural world are rooted in ecological truths that humans often overlook or ignore because we are caught in self-interest or confused about our priorities. We are ideological beings in need of an ethical awakening, according to Leopold.
CLAIM
So, your claim should address what you think our ethical obligation to the environment truly is, and your rationale should assert the principle or main reason for that obligation.
WHAT NOT TO DO
Avoid the pitfall of arguing for what we already do or know, such as recycling and banning plastic. We do not need to argue for practices or actions here. This argument is for ethics–a way of thinking. This is a philosophical, not practical argument.
WHAT TO DO
Your argument is for your philosophy–your better way of thinking–about our true obligations to our world.
SUPPORTING YOUR PHILOSOPHY
You can ground your argument in what you understand about ecology. The basis for a philosophy must be in reality. Ecology helps us understand our reality, the real conditions and workings of life on Earth. Ecology provides the tools that you can give your readers to convince them to change their values.
Prompt: In your informed view, what is our ethical obligation to our environment?
Directions: Based on what you have learned in this module, present your own specific ethical argument, borrowing ideas from others as needed. Defend your position against the reasonable objections of your audience. Support your argument with ethical reasoning, selected facts gathered from our readings and viewing, as well as persuasive concepts from Leopold’s “The Land Ethic.” Some brainstorming questions to help you think through your position:
What ethical obligations do you believe arise from being an individual member of the biotic community?
Is there an ecological or scientific basis for your position? How can we make the connection between scientific truth and ethics?
Should humans strive to empathize with the non-human world? Why or why not?
Can and will you “practice what you preach?
Audience: Address an audience of your friends and peers. Aim to appeal to their level of awareness and critical thinking. Length: 1250-1500 words approximately. Format: Use MLA format for the layout of the essay, as well as citation and documentation. MLA format.
Sources: Use the materials we have read or viewed in this module. Draw examples and evidence from these sources. If you need current data about environmental issues, you should do additional research. An essay should always reflect the course materials.
Checklist:
Argument related, detailed title
Hook
Argumentative Thesis (claim and rationale)
At least 4 body paragraphs with topic and conclusion sentences
Evidence, examples, and reasoning drawn from course materials
Strong final paragraph that draws the big conclusion from the body
Careful editing
MLA formatted Work Cited
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!