Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Evaluating Principles of Epidemiology Focus on Public Health
Evaluating, Principles, Epidemiology, Focus, Public, Health
The principles of epidemiology focus on public health and the measurement factors of
interest for health professionals to detect associations and determine population risk.
Zika, HIV, Influenza, infant morbidity, and mortality are examples of public health
concerns that epidemiologists track, trend, and report.
It is important to note that although some populations may appear similar
geographically or demographically, when tracking epidemiological trends, populations
may appear to vary significantly between states or even between counties within those
states.
This Assignment has two parts:
Part 1: PowerPoint Presentation
Submit by Day 7.
Part 2: Executive Summary
Prepare an Executive Summary of your findings regarding the impact of social
determinants of health-on-health outcomes. This summary will be posted in the
Discussion Board on Day 2 of Week 5 (next week), and will serve as your Discussion
response prompt for Week 5.
To Prepare:
Select two counties in the same state that are not similar demographically to focus on.
You may want to consider the county you live or work in as one of the two counties.
Access the National Environment Public Health Tracking Network from this week’s
Learning Resources.
Enter the following parameters:
Content Area: Select Heart Disease
Indicator: Select Mortality Rate
Measure: Select Age Adjusted Death Rate
Geographical Level: Select State by County (Data Smoothed)
Select a state for your data.
Select the most recent year available
Select all races/ethnicities available
Compare the heart attack mortality rate/100,000 people for the two counties you
selected.
You can view the data as a map, chart, or table. The row that has the data of interest
will allow you to select the view you want.
Select the table view, and the click the down arrow to download the table.
Open the table, and save an Excel file (.xlsx).
Review the data you obtain for the two counties you selected.
Reflect on the results that you obtain for different ethnic groups within the counties you
selected.
Access the map of uninsured rates by the U.S. Census Bureau (2015) provided in this
week’s Learning Resources.
Review and reflect on the uninsured rates for the congressional districts for the counties
you selected.
Part 1: PowerPoint Presentation
Prepare a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
Explain the trends you observe between each of the counties you selected.
Research and explain the social determinants of health for heart disease for the
counties you selected. Be specific, and provide examples.
You can use the Excel sheet you saved during your data search on one of the slides.
Write 2-3 comments about the data.
You may also choose to do research using online databases, like the CDC and WHO,
or by speaking with local health professionals. Be sure to reference and cite your
sources accordingly.
What resources for addressing heart disease may be lacking in one county compared to
the other?
Describe whether the number of insured persons over the last 5 years has increased or
decreased for your counties.
Do health outcomes over this same time frame correlate with this trend? Explain your
response.
Is there a correlation between the levels of health insurance coverage, healthcare costs,
or healthcare access and the health outcomes you observed?
As a healthcare leader in the state you selected, recommend at least one program that
might improve the health of the population, and explain why. Be specific, and provide
examples.
Part 2: Executive Summary
Create a 2- to 3-paragraph summary of your findings that addresses the following:
Be sure to include how the social determinants of health (SDOH) have impacted the
health outcomes of the members of the population you researched, as well as the
impact to economics perspectives.
Use the questions you addressed in the PowerPoint as a guide.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!