Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ethical Guidelines For Debate
The following guidelines should be followed when debating. Following these guidelines will not solve every ethical issue you may face as a debator, but they should help provide a “compass” to guide you.
1. Be Honest
This is one of the most important guidelines to follow as a public speaker and debator. We operate on the assumption that people are telling the truth until we catch them in an untruth. We have an ethical duty as speakers to present the facts honestly to our audience members. One way to help maintain your credibility is to cite your sources orally. NOTE: It is never okay to make up information in a debate!
2. Make Sure Any Solutions Offered are Ethically Sound
To be a responsible public speaker/debator, you must weigh the ethical soundness of your goals. Ask yourself “What do I hope to accomplish with my speech?” and think about the goal(s) that you have- would they be morally acceptable in society?
3. Be Fully Prepared
What are the two things we hate most to be wasted? If you guessed time and money, you are correct! As a debator, you should be fully prepared for your debate. All research must be done prior to the debate. When you are not fully prepared it can harm your credibility. Everything you do says something about your character- from emails sent to papers you write, from speeches you deliver to the way you interact with others- how do you wish to be viewed?
4. Avoid Name-Calling and Other Abusive Language
This may seem like common sense- we shouldn’t act unprofessionally as speakers. However, in today’s society we seem to thrive on watching people act unprofessionally. We have lost a sense of professionalism and what it means to act professionally. Even our elected officials (Congress and some in the White House) appear to cater to this idea of “entertainment value” and “instant gratification” rather than making ethical choices about acting as a professional and/or educated individual. It is important that we learn when it is appropriate and inappropriate to use certain language. Slang terms, name-calling, and generally abusive language toward your audience or toward someone else on stage with you is not professional and not appropriate. Using such language is counterproductive to being an ethical speaker and it reinforces attitudes that encourage racism, hatred, prejudice and other injustices. While some people would say that they have freedom of speech, and that may be true, we are learning to be ethical public speakers/debators that protect our reputation by acting professional and with dignity. Remember that things you say can (and do) come back to bite you later and can destroy everything you have worked for in an instant. Rule of thumb: Speak to people as you would wish them to speak to you. Another thing to keep in mind is that we attack arguments and evidence, not people.
5. Follow Debate Etiquette Rules
Lastly, academic debate has very specific rules regarding etiquette. We will learn those rules in class, but it’s up to you to implement them. We must work together to maintain the integrity of the debate process – everyone must do their part.
https://humanparts.medium.com/the-other-side-is-not-dumb-2670c1294063
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac9jI02-Fyg&feature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9McrEaovuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vWXpzlL7Mo&feature=emb_logo
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!