Ethical implications of renewable desalination technologies
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Ethical implications of renewable desalination technologies
In the year 2000, renewable desalination technologies were still in their early stages of development. However, even at that time, there were several ethical implications associated with these technologies. Here are some of the key ethical considerations:
Environmental Impact: One of the primary motivations for developing renewable desalination technologies was to reduce the environmental impact of traditional desalination methods, which often relied on fossil fuels. However, the deployment of new technologies also raised concerns about potential environmental consequences. It was important to ensure that the renewable energy sources used in desalination, such as solar or wind power, were themselves sustainable and did not cause significant harm to ecosystems or local communities.
Water Equity: Desalination is often employed in regions facing water scarcity, where access to freshwater resources is limited. The ethical challenge lies in ensuring that the benefits of desalination are distributed equitably, without exacerbating existing social inequalities. In 2000, it was important to consider how these technologies could be made accessible to all communities, including marginalized or disadvantaged populations, and to prevent any potential privatization of water resources that could disproportionately affect vulnerable groups.
Economic Considerations: The implementation of renewable desalination technologies had economic implications. The costs associated with developing and deploying these technologies needed to be weighed against their potential benefits. Ethical questions arose regarding the allocation of financial resources, as investing in renewable desalination could divert funds from other pressing social or environmental needs. It was important to ensure that the economic burden did not fall disproportionately on certain groups or regions.
Indigenous Rights: In areas where renewable desalination projects were proposed or implemented, it was crucial to consider the rights and interests of indigenous communities. These projects might impact their traditional lands, water sources, or cultural practices. Respecting indigenous rights, engaging in meaningful consultation, and obtaining their free, prior, and informed consent were ethical imperatives to avoid infringing upon their rights and causing harm.
Technological Displacement: The introduction of new renewable desalination technologies could potentially disrupt existing industries or livelihoods, particularly those dependent on traditional desalination methods. Ethical considerations involved anticipating and managing any negative socio-economic impacts caused by the transition to renewable technologies, such as providing retraining or alternative employment opportunities for affected individuals or communities.
Long-Term Sustainability: While renewable desalination technologies offered a more sustainable approach to addressing water scarcity, it was important to assess their long-term sustainability. This included considering factors such as the availability and reliability of renewable energy sources, the environmental impact of manufacturing and maintaining desalination infrastructure, and the overall energy efficiency of the process. Ensuring that renewable desalination technologies were truly sustainable and did not create new problems in the future was an ethical responsibility.
These ethical implications, among others, had to be considered during the early stages of renewable desalination technology development in the year 2000. Over time, as technology advanced and understanding of these implications improved, efforts were made to address these ethical considerations and promote responsible and equitable deployment of renewable desalination technologies.
Ethical implications of renewable desalination technologies
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!