Essentials of Strategic Planning in Healthcare
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Essentials of Strategic Planning in Healthcare
on the cause of these problems and how to address them. Healthcare executives must part- ner with physicians, nurses, and other clinicians to determine the best metrics to improve quality and to ensure positive patient outcomes and financial success for the organization.
c O m pa r at i v e O u t c O m e s
In the early 1900s, Dr. Ernest Codman, a pioneering surgeon and an advocate of healthcare reform, researched healthcare quality by measuring quality outcomes. His end results theory advocated measuring patient care to assess hospital efficiency and to identify clinical errors or other problems. The American College of Surgeons adopted his theory as a minimum quality standard. Based on this theory, the college created the Hospital Standardization Program, which later evolved into the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (now simply the Joint Commission). Codman also believed in public report- ing of quality, a concept being embraced today, a century later.
The American Hospital Association has also encouraged providers to establish qual- ity assurance programs to audit outcomes of care. The most comprehensive evaluation of hospital quality today is the CMS’s Hospital Comparing website (www.medicare.gov/ hospital compare/search.html). Hospital Compare allows for the comparison of up to three hospitals on measures of quality. The measures are grouped into six categories: survey of patients’ experiences, timely and effective care, complications and death, unplanned hospital admissions, psychiatric unit services, and payment and value of care. Other public reporting agencies and sites use data from the CMS measures. Hospital Compare has a consumer orientation, providing information on how well hospitals provide the recommended care to their patients. It also enables organizations to benchmark their performance against that of other hospitals in their community or state or nationally.
Organizations’ initial purpose for the transparency of publicly reported healthcare processes and outcomes was to help patients make informed decisions. Today’s consumer wants to consider the advantages and risks of recommended treatments. Besides gathering data from patient-satisfaction measures, healthcare organizations must also understand, define, and measure quality of care themselves. While patient satisfaction is not the only indicator of quality care, it is a significant goal. Providers could achieve exemplary clini- cal outcomes but have negative patient satisfaction scores if they have poor interpersonal skills or lack sensitivity to cultural differences among their patients. Public and private groups, such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), have developed tools for measuring and reporting healthcare quality. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS; see highlight 12.1) and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS; see highlight 12.2) are two other examples. Many hospitals use HCAHPS to assess patient experience and HEDIS to measure clinical performance in the outpatient setting.
Copying and distribution of this PDF is prohibited without written permission. For permission, please contact Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com
Harrison, Jeffrey P.. Essentials of Strategic Planning in Healthcare, Third Edition, Health Administration Press, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/apus/detail.action?docID=6349384. Created from apus on 2022-03-25 01:06:10.
rv e d .
C h a p t e r 1 2 : Q u a l i t y , S a f e t y , P a t i e n t E x p e r i e n c e , a n d V a l u e 2 6 1
HIGHLIGHT 12.1 Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems
HCAHPS (typically pronounced “H-Caps”) is a survey used to measure patient expe-
riences with healthcare providers. Use of this standardized survey allows providers
to compare their patients’ experiences with those of other patients across the United
States. All patients are asked the same questions, and all results are measured accord-
ing to the same rating scale. Patients respond by answering “always,” “usually,” “some-
times,” or “never” to most of the survey questions. Without a standardized survey,
comparisons of quality of care would be impossible.
The survey focuses on the following areas:
- How often did nurses communicate well with patients?
- How often did doctors communicate well with patients?
- How often did patients receive help quickly from hospital staff?
- How often did staff explain about medicines before giving them to patients?
- How often were the patients’ rooms and bathrooms kept clean?
- How often was the area around patients’ rooms kept quiet at night?
- Were patients given information about what to do during their recovery at home?
- How well did patients understand the type of care they would need after leaving
the hospital?
- What number would patients use to rate the hospital during their stay?
- Would patients recommend the hospital to friends and family?
CMS implemented the HCAHPS survey in October 2006, and hospitals first publicly
reported the results in March 2008. The survey, its methodology, and its results are in
the public domain and can be found on the Hospital Compare website. Since July 2007,
hospitals receiving Medicare payments must collect and submit HCAHPS data to receive
their full annual payment. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) requires HCAHPS to be
included among the measures used to calculate incentive payments in the value-based
purchasing program.
*
Copying and distribution of this PDF is prohibited without written permission. For permission, please contact Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com
Harrison, Jeffrey P.. Essentials of Strategic Planning in Healthcare, Third Edition, Health Administration Press, 2020. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/apus/detail.action?docID=6349384. Created from apus on 2022-03-25 01:06:10.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!