Essential Tools for Project Planning
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Essential Tools for Project Planning
Project planning is a critical aspect of project management. It involves developing a comprehensive roadmap that outlines the objectives, goals, timeline, resources, and budget of a project. Effective project planning can help organizations to achieve their desired outcomes, ensure that projects are delivered on time and within budget, and minimize the risks associated with project implementation.
To create a comprehensive project plan, project managers must use a range of tools and techniques. In this article, we will explore the essential tools for project planning.
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
The WBS is a hierarchical decomposition of the project into manageable and measurable work components. It breaks down the project into smaller, more manageable components, making it easier to plan and track progress. The WBS helps project managers to define project tasks, allocate resources, and establish a timeline for completion.
Gantt Charts
A Gantt chart is a visual representation of a project schedule that shows the start and end dates of each task, as well as the dependencies between them. Gantt charts help project managers to plan and track project progress, identify critical tasks, and allocate resources efficiently.
Project Management Software
Project management software, such as Asana, Trello, and Microsoft Project, can be used to manage and track all aspects of a project. These tools help project managers to assign tasks, monitor progress, and communicate with team members.
Risk Assessment Tools
Risk assessment tools are used to identify and assess potential risks to a project. These tools help project managers to anticipate and mitigate risks before they become problems. Some common risk assessment tools include SWOT analysis, PEST analysis, and risk management software.
Resource Management Tools
Resource management tools are used to allocate resources effectively, including human resources, equipment, and budget. These tools help project managers to balance resource availability with project demands, and ensure that resources are used efficiently.
Communication Tools
Effective communication is critical to the success of any project. Communication tools, such as email, instant messaging, and video conferencing, help project managers to communicate with team members, stakeholders, and clients.
Budgeting Tools
Budgeting tools help project managers to manage project costs, including tracking expenses and managing budgets. Some common budgeting tools include Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets, and specialized project management software.
Stakeholder Management Tools
Stakeholder management tools help project managers to identify and engage with stakeholders, including clients, sponsors, and team members. These tools help project managers to understand stakeholder expectations, manage relationships, and ensure that stakeholders are satisfied with project outcomes.
Quality Management Tools
Quality management tools are used to ensure that project deliverables meet the required standards of quality. These tools help project managers to define quality standards, measure quality, and ensure that project outcomes meet the expectations of stakeholders.
Change Management Tools
Change management tools help project managers to manage changes to project scope, timeline, or budget. These tools help project managers to identify and manage change requests, communicate changes to stakeholders, and ensure that changes are incorporated into the project plan effectively.
In conclusion, project planning is critical to the success of any project. Project managers must use a range of tools and techniques to create a comprehensive project plan, including work breakdown structures, Gantt charts, project management software, risk assessment tools, resource management tools, communication tools, budgeting tools, stakeholder management tools, quality management tools, and change management tools. By using these tools effectively, project managers can ensure that projects are delivered on time, within budget, and to the required standard of quality.
Essential Tools for Project Planning
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!