Essay on Case Study in Philosophy Essay on Case Study in Philosophy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
1
– The adventurer is described by DeBeauvoir, and they appear to share some features with the free human.Where does DeBeauvoir’s analysis of “the adventurer” go wrong?In DeBeauvoir’s perspective, “the adventurer” is incorrect because it is solely focused on the conquering. Unlikely as it may seem, a free man is concerned with the outcome of his activities. “The adventurer” frequently takes advantage of his or her independence at the expense of others, committing themselves to a variety of jobs in order to spend the time in the present rather than the future. As a result, “the adventurer” does not spend their lives for a purpose, and he/she makes a mistake by being selfish. Also, when they do not allow others to have their freedom, they are undermining the freedom of others. As a result, “the explorer” is denied freedom and, as a result, ends up as an oppressor.2- What does “bad faith” mean, and how does De Beauvoir avoid it?De Beauvoir uses the term “bad faith” in The Ethics of Ambiguity to describe a situation in which a person is torn between the fear of something horrible happening and the temptations of the bad faith that surrounds him/her. Also, when pressured by social factors, people accept false values, relinquish their natural independence, and act inauthentically. “Ill faith” seeks to flee our freedom, and Beauvoir guards against it by expressly considering freedom as a goal and accepting responsibility for everything that occurs in our lives, good or bad.3- What is the significance of De Beauvoir’s emphasis on situated freedom in the context of oppressed peoples? What is the proper attitude to have while interacting with severely oppressed people, and what is De Beauvoir’s justification for this?De Beauvoir emphasizes situated freedom in the case of oppressed peoples because she feels that oppressed peoples’ values are not chosen for them by restricting their freedom. Furthermore, oppressed peoples are unable to conceive themselves as anything other than what they were created for and what their purpose in society is. When dealing with severely oppressed people, compassion is preferable to judgment, which should not be utilized in this situation.4- What, according to Levinas, is the problem with most present ways of thinking about identity? What are some ways to prevent these issues by thinking in terms of autrui?The problem with most existing ways of thinking about identity is that philosophers have a hard time thinking about difference and regard it as a flaw, while Levinas advocates for a concept of non-conceptual difference. The problem with existing modes of thought, according to Levinas, is that they are detached theories. Rather than theory, Levinas wants ethics to be anchored in experience, and he wants to find out how each individual learnt their ethical behavior through their own experiences. As a result, the autrui, or “Other,” is one method to explain things. These issues can be avoided by genuinely experiencing the other person and identifying and classifying that the Other is an individual who is separate and entirely free to be, and then approaching the boundaries of our understanding.5- What, according to De Beauvoir, is the relationship between “seriousness” and “nihilism”? What, in addition, does De Beauvoir believe is the flaw in each attitude?Different categories of humans, such as the serious man, the sub-man, and the nihilist, are described by De Beauvoir as modes of fleeing freedom. To avoid freedom, the serious man pursues life and comprehends his decisions as if his values are permanent and objective. The serious man, on the other hand, believes that this way of thinking is justified, even if it devalues others. He also finds a cause that appeals to their ideas. This is not freedom, according to De Beauvoir, because this individual is choosing to perceive his values in such a manner that he gives up his freedom to that value, without choosing actions in freedom, which implies that freedom is lost.The nihilist fails to take life seriously and denies their freedom, creating nothingness in the name of freedom rather than rejection of freedom; in essence, they recognize that there are no perfectly justified values and deny their ability to create meaning to whatever they wish. De Beauvoir agrees that the nihilist is correct in his belief that values are unsupported by anything, and that the nihilist has effectively abandoned values. When we examine the remnant of the serious attitude that asserts “a real value isn’t willed into being by humans, it has to exist independently,” the nihilist concludes that there are no values and that the cosmos does not furnish them with meaning. Which looks for any values that aren’t reliant on each other. Beauvoir acknowledges that the nihilist is correct in his belief that values are unsupported by anything, and that the nihilist has effectively abandoned values. She disagrees, however, with how nihilists do not make use of their own freedom, and he claims that nihilists are confined to a single ideal only to be disappointed by it. They lose trust in all principles as a result of this disappointment.The link between “seriousness” and “nihilism,” in which both believe their ideas are valid in order to avoid freedom. It is the responsibility of a thoughtful man to refuse his own freedom. The Nihilist, on the other hand, is accountable for renouncing freedom, and a dissatisfied serious man is considered a Nihilist. They had something external to cherish before, but it let them down.6- Towards the end of the essay, de Beauvoir discusses the Cause extensively. What makes a good or worthy cause different from a bad one?De Beauvoir demonstrates that traditional conceptions of God and humankind, which include both religion and a Marxist revolution, are incorrect because they rely on objective qualities that are not derived from choice and freedom. De Beauvoir demonstrates that respecting human freedom and the will of others can prevent people from making life-ending decisions. De Beauvoir believes that there is no determinant end, and that any end that is discovered should be available to others for revision and continuation, which is the polar opposite of both ideas, which assume that a determinant end can be reached by sacrificing the present and the people who live in it. As a result, worthy causes are the only causes that will not lead to totalitarianism and will preserve human dignity, and when you are honest and have a purpose, an aim that matters to you. Furthermore, these causes or programs must take into account the finite human beings who actively appropriate the past, comprehend the present, and work toward a future goal without jeopardizing trust or becoming too comfortable with our objectives. As a result, we must constantly rethink and analyze our efforts as well as the direction we have chosen. When you conclude that your choices aren’t yours to make and that they don’t important to you, you’re betraying your ideals rather than representing them because of dishonest decisions.7- Why does Royce believe that we should choose our cause consciously if we can, and haphazardly if we can’t? Can’t we just wait until we have more information before deciding on a cause?According to Royce, everyone has the freedom to make their own decisions without fear of the repercussions. Royce is attempting to convey that even in the absence of information, we can select our cause since we are lost without one, and that lack of understanding is not an excuse for not making a decision. As a result, making a decision is preferable to making no decision at all. Furthermore, waiting for knowledge to make a decision may make it too late to pursue the cause.8- Why does Royce believe that an ethical person must be committed to a cause?While the opponent claims to be against loyalty, Royce describes him as “a living example of… loyalty to the faithful man,” implying that the opponent is committed to his cause. Furthermore, when Royce says, “Let loyalty be your gem of high price,” he compares loyalty to a pearl. (p.157), and I agree with him because, no matter what we experience in life, we should always be loyal to any circumstance since we are human, and we will feel better about ourselves if we keep to our allegiance and mention it whenever necessary. According to Royce, an ethical person must be committed to a cause since loyalty is the cornerstone of ethical consideration, which includes one’s own self, the community/rules, and humanity.According to Royce, loyalty is a powerful and self-reinforcing notion. According to Royce, we must choose a cause and be as loyal to it as loyalty to loyalty allows, which means that we should agree with the loyalty itself even if we disagree with the cause to which another person is dedicated. Furthermore, Royce advises that all humans should be respected for their loyalty, and that everyone should show support for others. If someone gets themselves into a poor situation, you should try to help them out. As a result, when it comes to assisting friends and family, loyalty should be an inherent virtue that comes effortlessly.9- How do youngsters acquire their values, according to DeBeauvoir? What happens to their sense of inherited values as they get older?According to De Beauvoir, our wills and values grow throughout our childhood. Children have no ethical basis and lack the experience to pick their own individual value or anticipate the repercussions of their acts, despite the fact that they develop throughout our formative stages. As a result, children develop their values through reflecting values from external sources such as their parents, their environment, and the culture in which they are reared. When children approach puberty, however, their values begin to evolve as they understand that the adults around them have flaws and that there are other values in this world besides their own..
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!