Essay about Music200 Concerts Throughout History
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Essay about Music200 Concerts Throughout History
The purpose of this assignment is to compare a performance of classical music to a performance of pop/rock music while utilizing musical language to describe your thoughts.
The following are the course objectives:
CO-1: Recognize Western music styles and eras.
CO-2: Apply musical vocabulary, concepts, and critical listening skills to a specific composer or musical style.
CO-3: Examine the influences of social, political, and cultural factors on Western and non-Western music.
Description:
Choose an extract from one of two concerts: one from a pop or rock concert of your choice and one from a Classical Era (1750-1800 AD) performance from the list below. Each concert is roughly 10 minutes long. (Please note that the rock or pop concert you choose should be one you see or attend during this course, not one you saw or attended before.)
After watching the musical snippets, make a comparison of the two concerts and respond to the following questions:
1. Describe why you liked or disliked the concerts.
2. Examine the parallels and differences between classical music and rock and pop music. Make sure to mention specific musical aspects of the concerts, and convey your thoughts using musical language and information from the course materials.
3. Compare and contrast the types of people who went to classical performances vs those who go to rock or pop concerts nowadays, as well as the reasons why people went to classical concerts versus rock or pop concerts today. (Be sure to substantiate your comments regarding concerts during the Classical era with specific material from scholarly sources.)
4. Examine how new technologies, such as digital media and the internet, are altering how people listen to music.
List of Classical Concerts
” Piano Concerto No. 23 in A major,” says the composer. Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
” Violin Concerto No. 1 in D major,” says the composer. Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
” Symphony No. 25 in G minor ” is a composition written in the key of G minor. Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus
“Cello Concerto No. 1 in C major,” says the composer. Haydn, Franz Josef
” Symphony No. 104 in D major,” says the composer. Haydn, Franz Josef
” Night Music from Madrid’s Streets,” Boccherini, Luigi
” Piano Sonata No. 2 in B minor, Op. 40,” Clementi, Muzio
“Piano Concerto No. 4 in G major,” says the composer. Ludwig van Beethoven was a German composer.
” Symphony No. 4 in B-flat Major,” says the composer. Ludwig van Beethoven was a German composer.
This paper should be between 750 and 1000 words long. This work should demonstrate that you have read and comprehended the course materials. Specific information from scholarly sources should be used to back up points, and musical language should be employed to describe concepts. This paper should be prepared in paragraph format, with whole sentences, a clear introduction, and a clear conclusion. In the introduction and end, make sure to mention both shows.
In addition to these requirements, please make sure you follow the Writing Assignment Requirements (see below), which include citing all sources (including the concerts) both in the text and on a reference page. Please keep in mind that in the humanities, MLA is the conventional citation style. Here are some excellent resources for evaluating online resources, citing sources, and writing and grammar resources. The concert video links should be acknowledged both in the body of the text and in the reference page.
Take into account the following:
This assignment is due by 11:55 p.m. on Sunday of Week 4. (Eastern time). Late contributions will be downgraded automatically according to the APUS late policy.
Papers must be attached to the email. Make sure your attachment is in the.doc,.docx, or.rtf format, as described in the Requirements for Written Assignments section (see above link).
DISCLAIMER: Turnitin will check the attachments for originality. The results will be sent to both you and your instructor.
If you have any questions concerning this assignment, please post them in the Questions topic in Discussions or send them to me via email.
NOTE: If you are serving overseas and are having trouble downloading or viewing concerts, you can complete an alternate assignment. Simply describe your issue in an email, and I will send you the other assignment.
Note: Papers will be added to and tested against the normal Turnitin repositories automatically. Within 15 minutes of submission, the instructor and student will receive their originality reports.
ASSIGNMENT WRITING REQUIREMENTS
APUS MUSI200
CONTENT – The term “content” refers to the topic matter. – Demonstrates understanding and awareness of major themes and concepts. – The application of analysis, synthesis, and comparison is reflected in the content. – The main points are expressed clearly, and they are expanded and supported by precise facts, examples, research, or analysis based on scholarly sources. ORGANIZATION – The response is structured in a logical and organized manner, with an introduction and conclusion. – Smooth transitions between sentences and paragraphs. – Sentences are clear, simple, and complete. MECHANICS – The response adheres to conventional grammar, use, punctuation, and spelling requirements.
– Any material cited is properly cited, including both in-text and reference citations in MLA format. This is a great website for MLA citations.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!