ES 11110 Discussion on Food Containing Genetically Modified Organisms
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Discussion 1: Peer Response and Assignment:
Our first debate will focus on public perceptions of science in general, not only the environment. Why are we driven to products that claim to be better, stronger, manufactured with natural flavors, maximum strength, all natural, organic, pesticide-free, animal testing-free, GMO-free, and so on? Why are these designations important, even if their meaning is ambiguous and insignificant? The question isn’t so much about opinions as it is about why diverse points of view arise around the same topic.What factors do people consider when deciding whether or not to agree with these statements? People may claim that their judgment is based on objective analysis or science in numerous circumstances. Others may believe that science or certain components of science are untrustworthy. Science or scientists, in theory, are always correct. Unfortunately, there are situations when scientists disagree over whether a particular step is necessary. How can we reconcile these contradictions and decide how to respond to a particular claim?
undefined
Select two or three of the following statements as the foundation for answering the following questions in your first post:
undefined
1. Food that contains genetically modified organisms should be clearly labeled.
undefined
2. Organic food is more nutrient-dense than conventional food.
undefined
3. Parents should be able to choose whether or not to vaccinate their children.
undefined
4. Vaccination against specific diseases should be required and provided free of charge.
undefined
5. Results that support a scientist’s conclusions are more likely to be highlighted.
undefined
6. In the event of a pandemic, facemasks should not be necessary in stores.
undefined
7. Material human embryos should not be used in stem cell research.
undefined
8. Any changes to the Earth’s climate as a result of human activities are unlikely to be long-lasting.
undefined
9. Active research should be conducted to monitor all drinking water for lead pollution.
undefined
10. We must take steps to combat climate change.
Post your answers to two other students’ postings about how we form our opinions. If you disagree with someone’s point of view, remain respectful when expressing your disagreement.
undefined
Discussion Assignment Requirements
Each discussion topic requires students to make one initial post and at least two responses. Other pupils’ responses should be substantive. Responses such as “I agree” or “Good point” will not get you any points. Responses to classmates must contribute to the progress of the discussion. Students may agree or disagree, but all postings must adhere to the NEC Netiquette Guidelines in terms of courtesy and respect. All posts must adhere to academic integrity; for additional information, check the NEC Academic Integrity Policy in the curriculum and the definition of plagiarism below.
undefined
Unless the instructor specifies differently, students will make the following initial posts (one per forum):
undefined
Write a well-developed initial post (400 to 500 words per topic) that addresses all of the discussion board’s questions.
undefined
For each discussion forum, write at least two responses (400 words minimum) to peers.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!