Enterprise Architecture Framework Research Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Enterprise Architecture Framework Research Paper Assignment
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your research skills, analysis, and critical thinking skills to describe one of the enterprise architecture (EA) frameworks. This will provide you an opportunity to gain an in-depth understanding of one of the frameworks commonly used. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
• describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks, and an overall ongoing EA program• analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence, support, and enable an organization’s ability to contribute to strategic decision making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
Assignment
Select one of the enterprise architecture frameworks listed below:
• Zachman Framework
• The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
• Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF)
• DoD Architecture Framework (DODAF)• Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework (TEAF)
Research and write a paper that describes the chosen framework. Your description will include:
• Beginning paragraph to introduce the selected framework
• Framework’s purpose, scope, principles, and the kinds of structures it uses, as appropriate to the framework. Ensure that you adequately cover these four attributes.
• Provide a Graphic or image that shows the structure of the model you have chosen. This provides a good visual of what you are explaining and provides additional context.
• Provide analysis of the framework’s strengths and weaknesses.• Find more than two examples of organizations that have used the framework and briefly discuss them. (NOTE: More than two examples are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) Apply critical thinking, especially when describing the structure and its strengths and weaknesses.
• Concluding paragraph to wrap-up key points.
Your paper will be graded on both the accuracy and completeness of your description. Please be mindful of how you research and provide on-line sources. Refer to UMUC’s policy on plagiarism especially as it pertains to unauthorized student resources.Your paper should be 3-5 pages in length (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages). The use of at least three external scholarly resources (other than class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than three external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and authorless website postings). If you need assistance with determining what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information, accessed via the following link: http://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/articles.cfm. Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Submit your paper in Word format via your Assignments Folder as an attached document with your last name included in the filename.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of this assignment.Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Introduction 5 PointsA sophisticated introduction sets the stage for the paper. 4 Points
A well-written introduction sets the stage for the paper. 3.5 Points
The introduction adequately sets the stage for the paper. 3 Points
The introduction does not adequately set the stage for the paper. 0-2 Points
No introduction included. 5
Description of Framework -Quality 18-20 PointsDescription of framework is clear and thorough and demonstrates sophisticated understanding of course concepts. 16-17 Points
Description of framework is clear and complete and demonstrates good understanding of course concepts. 14-15 Points
Description of framework includes the main points, and demonstrates adequate understanding of course concepts. 12-13 Points
Description of framework may be incomplete, and/or may not demonstrate adequate understanding of course concepts. 0-11 Points
Description of framework is not included or little is presented. 20
Description of Framework -Coverage 27-30 PointsSophisticated description covers purpose, scope, principles, types of structures used, as appropriate to the selected framework. 24-26 Points
Clear and complete description covers purpose, scope, principles, types of structures used, as appropriate to the selected framework. 21-23 Points
Description adequately covers purpose, scope, principles, and types of structures, as appropriate to the selected framework. 18-20 Points
Description may not adequately cover purpose, scope, principles, and/or types of structures, as appropriate to the selected framework. 0-17 Points
Little or no coverage of these areas is provided. 30
Strengths and Weaknesses of Framework 9-10 PointsStrengths and Weaknesses identified are clear, compelling, and directly related to the framework, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking, and synthesis. 8 Points
Strengths and Weaknesses identified are clear, and are directly related to the framework, demonstrating a good understanding of course concepts, analysis, critical thinking, and synthesis. 7 Points
Description of strengths and weaknesses are related to the framework; demonstrate adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking.
6 PointsDescription of strengths and weaknesses may not be clear, may not be directly related to the framework; and/or may not demonstrate adequate understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. 0-5 Points
Few or no strengths or weaknesses identified and explained. 10
Examples of Use 9-10 PointsMore than two examples of organizations that have used the framework are identified and clearly pertinent points are included in the discussion, using sophisticated writing. 8 Points
More than two examples of organizations that have used the framework are identified and pertinent points are included in the discussion, using clear writing. 7 Points
Two examples of organizations that have used the framework are identified and their use of the framework is adequately discussed. 6 Points
Two or fewer examples of organizations are identified and/or their use of the framework may not be adequately discussed. 0-5 Points
No examples of use of the framework are identified or minimal effort is demonstrated. 10
External Research 9-10 PointsMore than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, contextualized, appropriately researched and supported, and synthesized with original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references. 8 Points
More than three scholarly sources other than the class resources are incorporated and used effectively, appropriately researched and supported, and support original arguments. Sources used are credible, relevant, and timely. Proper APA style is used for citations and references. 7 Points
Three scholarly sources other than the class resources are properly incorporated and used. Uses APA format for references and citations. 6 Points
Three or fewer sources other than the class resources may be used; may not be scholarly sources; may not be properly incorporated or used to support arguments; may rely too heavily on the reporting of external sources, and/or are not effective or appropriate; and/or are not credible, relevant, or timely. May not use APA format. 0-5 Points
No external research is incorporated or reference listed is not cited within text. 10
Conclusion 5 Points
Conclusion is convincing, effective and relevant. Demonstrates sophisticated analysis and critical thinking. 4 Points
Conclusion is effective and relevant. Demonstrates analysis and critical thinking. 3.5 Points
Conclusion is provided and is relevant. 3 Points
Conclusion is somewhat effective and/or relevant. 0-2 Points
No conclusion provided, or minimal effort demonstrated. 5
Format 9-10 Points
Paper reflects effective organization and sophisticated writing; follows instructions provided; is written in third person; uses correct structure, grammar, and spelling; double- spaced and presented in a professional format using Word. 8 Points
Paper reflects effective organization; follows instructions provided; is written in third person; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, and presented in a professional format. 7 Points
Paper has some organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Is double spaced and written in third person. 6 Points
Paper is not well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person. 0-5 Points
Paper is extremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information. 10
TOTAL Points Possible 100
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!