Enhancing collaborative skills through cooperative problem-based learning
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Enhancing collaborative skills through cooperative problem-based learning
Collaborative skills are an essential component of modern education and the workplace. One effective way to enhance these skills is through cooperative problem-based learning (CPBL). CPBL is an educational approach that encourages students to work together in groups to solve complex, real-world problems. This approach is designed to promote active learning, critical thinking, and collaboration, all of which are essential skills in the modern workplace.
CPBL typically involves four stages: problem-solving, planning, implementation, and evaluation. The first stage involves identifying a problem that requires collaboration and problem-solving. The problem could be related to any subject or discipline, and it should be challenging enough to require a collaborative effort. The second stage involves planning the approach to solve the problem, which includes dividing the task into smaller, manageable parts and assigning roles to each group member.
The third stage involves implementing the plan, which involves group members working together to complete their assigned tasks. During this stage, group members are expected to communicate effectively, exchange ideas, and support each other to ensure that the task is completed successfully. The final stage involves evaluating the group’s performance, which includes assessing the quality of the group’s work, identifying areas for improvement, and providing feedback to the group members.
CPBL has several benefits for students, including the development of collaborative skills, critical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and leadership skills. CPBL also helps students to learn how to work effectively in teams, which is an essential skill in the modern workplace. Additionally, CPBL encourages students to take ownership of their learning, which increases their motivation to learn and their engagement in the learning process.
To implement CPBL successfully, educators must provide students with the necessary support and guidance. Educators should begin by clearly defining the problem and providing students with the necessary resources to solve the problem. Educators should also encourage students to work collaboratively by creating a positive learning environment, setting clear expectations for group work, and providing opportunities for students to reflect on their learning and performance.
In addition to providing support and guidance, educators should also use assessment and feedback to encourage student learning and development. Assessment should be ongoing and include both individual and group assessments. Feedback should be constructive and focus on areas for improvement rather than criticism. Educators should also provide opportunities for students to reflect on their learning and performance, which can help students to identify areas for improvement and develop a growth mindset.
Finally, it is important to note that CPBL is not without its challenges. One common challenge is ensuring that all group members are contributing equally to the task. To address this challenge, educators can assign specific roles and responsibilities to each group member and monitor group progress regularly. Another challenge is managing conflicts that may arise within the group. To address this challenge, educators should encourage students to communicate openly and respectfully and provide strategies for conflict resolution.
In conclusion, CPBL is an effective approach to enhance collaborative skills in students. CPBL encourages active learning, critical thinking, and collaboration, which are essential skills in the modern workplace. To implement CPBL successfully, educators must provide students with the necessary support and guidance and use assessment and feedback to encourage student learning and development. Although CPBL is not without its challenges, educators can address these challenges by assigning specific roles and responsibilities to each group member, monitoring group progress regularly, and providing strategies for conflict resolution.
Enhancing collaborative skills through cooperative problem-based learning
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!