English 102 Jodie Nicotra Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
English 102 Jodie Nicotra Rhetorical Analysis Essay
Learning Goal: I’m working on a English project and need support to help me learn.
write researches paper.please you work Resources for Citations in your Papers
1/ Overview
Thus far our class has developed strategies for analyzing source types, including multimodal texts, using rhetorical analysis. Jodie Nicotra writes that “circulation refers to the physical means by which a message gets distributed…In an era where most information is digital, it’s important to think of how a message has been or can be copied, forwarded, reposted, or appear in a way other than what one initially intended” (44).
Circulation is a key component of other concepts we’ve learned in Segment One:
- Information cycles help us understand how texts and source types circulate, and why they are circulated by different people at different times.
- Citation chasing and reading for research clues are strategies that help us backtrack to identify the original source of the information, or to find earlier, relevant sources. This is important because the original source, and its intended use or purpose, can get easily lost as a text circulates digitally, especially with such speed via social media.
2/ Text for your circulation analysis
Work with the following podcast as the focus of your circulation analysis:
- Turner, Aisha, and 371 Productions. “#100: Breaking the Cycle of Violence.” Precious Lives, WUWM 89.7, 13 Dec 2016: https://www.wuwm.com/2016-12-13/100-precious-lives-breaking-the-cycle-of-violence
*Content warning: very brief reference to childhood sexual violence*
3/ Assignment
This assignment asks you to compose a 6-7 page, double-spaced paper that analyzes texts that are related to the podcast and reflects on your responsibility as a reader/composer in an online circulation context. This paper should be written in the formal academic register directed to your instructor and peers. Your writing should demonstrate academic ethos through effective organization and formal prose that is relatively free of grammatical and mechanical errors.
4/ Outline
* Part 1: IDENTIFY
Identify Related Texts
After you’ve listened to the podcast you’re going to analyze for this assignment, and taken some good notes on its content and rhetorical components, identify the various texts related to or connected to this podcast. While we usually think about analyzing a text, like a book, in a static way that examines only the elements that are on the page, circulation analysis asks you to attend to various connected texts and their mediums. You can identify these related texts through lateral reading strategies, such as:
- Clicking on and reading embedded media:
- What related sources, articles, social media, or websites does the text directly link out to? Relatedly, what mediums (YouTube/News Article/Wiki page/ etc.) are these other texts published on? Read and explore this media, and remember to take note of the various technologies used to publish and share the new content. For example, if a YouTube or Vevo video is embedded on a website, click on the video to go to the YouTube page from there to see what other texts and responses you can find. Perhaps there is a description of the video or a series of user comments that are helpful for better understanding the primary text.
- Searching for key terms, events, people, or locations described in the text:
- Use a search tool (like Google or DuckDuckGo) to find additional information related to the primary text.
- Track down recent news sources related to the topics described in the primary text. How do issues related to a particular post come up in news searches?
- Type the topic or key terms into social media searches (such as Facebook or Twitter). What stories/memes/tweets/hashtags/photos/threads do you see?
- Are there any YouTube videos, Ted Talks, or other forms of video presentations related to this information? What comes up?
- Are there related podcasts? What are they?
NOTE: You don’t need to use every strategy question or prompt above to identify related texts. Some strategies will work better for certain texts or topics over others.
After you have spent some time with lateral reading strategies, choose 4-5 of the related texts you find most compelling to focus your analysis on and save these links in a Word Document. You should select a range of mediums for these connected texts, as opposed to, say, five news articles from the same source.
* Part 2: CONNECT
Connect Related Texts to Expand Contextual Understanding
Using these 4-5 related texts, compose a 4-5 page analysis that considers how these texts “outside” and “alongside” of the original text have reshaped your understanding of the podcast itself. Analyze the connected/related texts both in terms of the new information you gathered from them, and the role of the medium in shaping your relationship to that new information. Below are some questions to help you jumpstart your analysis:
Analyzing Content:
- What connected/related texts seem to be most important to understanding the primary text (the podcast) and why?
- Where do these connected/related texts fall on an information cycle? Is there a range of mediums or source types across an information cycle, or are they all clustered at one or two points on a cycle? What might that suggest about the role or value of these connected/related texts in developing additional information about the topic of the podcast?
- What additional context do the related texts offer to a reader? And how may that additional context shape what a reader cares about or how s/he engages with the topic?
- Identify some of the key conversations surrounding the topic, based on your search. How does the primary text, or podcast, support, challenge, or digress from these other conversations?
- Why are certain texts directly linked out to the website? Why may the rhetor(s) of the page on which the podcast appears choose to link directly to other mediums given the content contained there?
- As you searched, was there a particular medium that was more useful than others at conveying or articulating certain forms of information? Explain.
- Are there any response options embedded in the sources, such as an email option or a comment thread? Why may different mediums invite different forms of responses from readers?
- What content or ideas related to the podcast seem to circulate the most? What does that tell you about public knowledge and perception of the topic?
Analyzing Medium:
- What role, if any, did social media platforms have in how people approached this topic?
* Part 3: REFLECT
Reflect on What You Discovered through Your Circulation Analysis
Complete your analysis essay by composing an additional one-two page reflection that considers your responsibility as a reader/actor/composer in an online circulation context. The following questions are designed to help get you started with this reflection but this list is in no way definitive.
- What were the most significant discoveries you made about reading texts that circulate online?
- After looking at outside websites, links, forums, and searches, what perspective have your gained about how information circulates in the twenty-first century? What do you hope to remember as you continue your reading and research in ENGLISH 102?
- Did you run into any questions about validity or credibility? What kinds of mediums seemed to bring up those concerns and why do you think that is?
- What did lateral reading strategies make possible that standard reading practices (as in reading from left to right and up and down on a page) do not?
- Were there any perspectives or content that you were more resistant to listening to? Which perspectives and why (consider your own values and ideologies here)? How do you hope to move forward when you find content that you are resistant to or that you disagree with?
Requirements: two days
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!