ENG106 Proposal Essay for Peer Review
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ENG106 Proposal Essay for Peer Review
As a student in this course, one of your responsibilities is to provide constructive comments to your classmates in order to help them develop their writing skills. You can use this worksheet to help you provide such feedback. Double-click on the first word to highlight the text and type over the information in the boxes on this worksheet.
Type in the author’s name for the draft: Here is the author’s name:
The peer reviewer’s name is: Enter the name of the reviewer here.
Reviewer
Write a summary (3-5 words) of the work after reading it once more, including your opinion of how well the essay satisfies the assignment requirements as outlined in the syllabus and rubric.
Fill in the blanks with a 3-5 sentence summary.
Answer each of the following questions after a second, more thorough reading of the document. Positive responses will point out particular aspects of the draft to appreciate, while negative responses will point out parts that need to be improved and revised. Please respond to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet with at least three positive features of the draft and at least three areas for improvement.
Content and Ideas for a Proposal
How well does the thesis statement pinpoint the primary points that the author want to express in this proposal?
Fill in the blanks with your response
How successful is the paper in delivering a well-thought-out proposal?
Fill in the blanks with your response
How effective is evidence in justifying arguments and enriching the essay?
Fill in the blanks with your response
How well does the essay incorporate proposal-supporting tactics (such as categorical, similarity, ethical assertions, and cause-and-effect arguments)?
Fill in the blanks with your response
Organization
How well does the introduction hold the reader’s attention while presenting a summary of the paper?
Fill in the blanks with your response
Please identify and quote the writer’s thesis in the box below.
Here’s where you’ll type the thesis of a writer.
How well do the paragraphs promote the essay’s arguments and develop the topic sentence?
Fill in the blanks with your response
How well does the conclusion create a compelling, satisfying conclusion rather than just a synopsis of the essay?
Fill in the blanks with your response
Format
How closely does the work adhere to the APA style of formatting? Is the Times New Roman typeface 12 pt. double-spaced? Is there a 1″ margin around it? Does it make use of headers (e.g., page numbers with the appropriate header function)? Is it properly labeled (with the student’s name, the date, the course, and the instructor’s name)?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Are all sources of information, quotations, and borrowed ideas cited in APA parentheses?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Are all sources included in APA format on the references page?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Is the minimum number of sources required listed?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Language Style and Usage
Is the essay’s voice and tone effective in describing concepts and setting the proper tone? Please give examples of ineffective or inappropriate voice and tone if you answered no.
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
How well does the paper use a range of sentence forms to reinforce the ideas, add vibrancy, and keep the language from being choppy?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
What is your opinion of the writer’s diction (word choice)? Are active verbs, definite nouns, and specific words used by the author?
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Mechanics and Grammar
Is the writer’s grammar, punctuation, and spelling correct? If you answered no, please give examples of errors that need to be corrected.
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
Is the writing throughout the text clear and understandable? If you answered no, please give examples of areas where you think you could improve.
| |Yes | |No | |No | |Yes | |No | |No | |No | |
The following are three aspects of your manuscript that I found appealing:
1. Write down the first thing you liked.
2. Write a second thing you enjoyed.
3. Write a third thing you enjoyed.
The following are three things that could be improved:
1. Identify the first area that has to be improved.
2. Identify the second area for improvement.
3. Identify the third area for improvement.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!