Employee Turnover Research Project 2
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Employee Turnover Research Project 2
Running head: RESEARCH REPORT 1
Running head: RESEARCH REPORT 2
Employee Turnover Research Project Part Two
Thomas Griffin
Husson University
Research Paper Part Two
Fundamentally, a research design refers to a set of methods and frameworks that a researcher can adopt in a bid to combine the various components of the research in a logical manner. Typically, the research design will provide an insight about how to undertake a research activity while utilizing a particular methodology (Abutabenjeh & Jaradat, 2018). The design should provide a sketch of the research and can also be used to explain the type of research and the subtype.
Population and Sampling Method
For the researcher to promote the credibility and reliability of the data, probability sampling will be undertaken. It refers to a sampling method where each participant has an equal chance of being included in the sample (Abutabenjeh & Jaradat, 2018). However, it is imperative to note that in this case that the sampling population encompasses individuals that have an employer for another. Probability sampling means any individuals in this population has an equal chance of being included. Under probability sampling, stratified random sampling will be undertaken. It refers to a technique where the population is divided into subgroups and the samples are taken from each subgroup. In this case, the researcher will divide the participants into the following subgroups. Subgroup one will only have individuals that have only left a single employer. Subgroup two will have participants that have left more than one employer for others. The final subgroup will be made up of participants considering leaving the current employer. From these subgroups, samples will be randomly chosen to take part in the research. The reason for doing this is to promote diversity of the group so as to unearth the primary factors contributing to the turnover problem that is making organizations incur costs in recruiting and selection.
During sampling, it is imperative to note that there are confounding variables that must be avoided. These are factors that may negatively impact the validity of the research process. One of the factors entail participants who left their former employers for reasons not related to their performance and perceived expectations. This includes factors such as retrenchment, gross misconduct, and the need to relocate among others. Also, confounding variables, including being fired among others will need to be looked into. Typically, the sampled participants will be asked to outline the primary reason why they left their former work station. If the reason is considered a confounding variable, the responses made by such a participant will be considered invalid.
Dependent and Independent Variables
From a research perspective, a dependent variable is dependent on the independent variable. The latter is controlled by the researcher while the former is only dependent on the independent variable (Abutabenjeh & Jaradat, 2018). It was earlier noted that this research aims at determining the primary factors that lead to a high rate of turnover. In this case, personal factors will be treated as the independent variable while the probability of leaving an organization will be treated as the dependent variable. This means that the research will identify the cause and effect relationship between the independent and the dependent variables. It will then indicate the factors that have a high probability of making an employee leave an organization. This is how the variables will be measured, hence testing the hypothesis that was earlier outlined. It stated that “Employees will leave an organization meet their expectations.” The cause and effect relationship provided by measuring the variables will test it.
Descriptive Research Design
From the constructs indicated in the last section, it can be seen that the research design is descriptive. This refers to a design that is about showing or describing the situation through detailing a cause and effect relationship (Kothari, 2009). This design provides insight and also show a new angle relating to a particular phenomenon, in this case, the employees leaving an organization. The design does this through the collection and analysis of data. The data are analyzed in a manner that identifies a cause and effect relationship between the identified variables.
In order for the desired goals of the research to be realized, it is worth noting that the researcher will need to contextualize the research processes so as to promote the credibility of the research. A descriptive research design needs to ensure that the participants are not influenced when being involved in a research process. For this to be done, the researcher must identify personal and cultural factors that may influence the participants and must devise ways of addressing them. This can be done by asking the participants about a setting they would wish for when being involved in the data collection procedures. This will make them feel motivated and get more comfortable hence likely to give honest and credible responses.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!