Elm Manufacturing Company (ELM) Types of Backpacks
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Elm Manufacturing Company (ELM) Types of Backpacks
Question Description
Elm Manufacturing Company (ELM) is a small manufacturer of back packs located in Rochelle, Illinois. They make three different types of Backpacks:
A small backpack made for school that is designed to hold books with compartments for school supplies and an outside compartment for a water bottle.This backpack is purchased throughout the year by bookstores, office supply stores, department stores and other specialty stores (e.g. school supply stores) (product number SP001).A backpack made for hiking that is designed for individuals that want to spend the day outside.It is more sturdy then the school backpack and has compartments for clothing, food, water, and other hiking supplies.It is largely purchased by camping and sporting goods stores, although it is also carried by department stores that have sporting goods sections and other specialty stores (e.g. bicycle stores) (product number HB005).
A backpack made for camping. This backpack has a metal frame and includes compartments for various camping equipment including places to tie on a sleeping bag. It is primarily sold in specialty camping stores and sporting goods stores, but some larger department stores may carry these (product number CB008).
Some of the relevant information for these products is included below.
Type Product
NumberUnit Product
CostUnit Price
(wholesale in cases)Total Units Sold Total Sales 2020 School Pack SP00 $ 8.06 $ 10.00 249,480 $ 2,494,800.00 Hiking Pack HB005 $ 18.76 $ 23.00 212,940 $ 4,897,620.00 Camping Pack CB008 $ 65.16 $ 97.00 85,104 $ 8,255,088.00 Total Sales $ 15,647,508.00 All items are only sold by the case (12 per case).
Although the company sells the backpacks to retailers and wholesalers by the case, the individual product is eventually sold to consumers at a variety of retail stores, including specialty sporting goods stores, as well as online retailers.
To increase sales and improve customer satisfaction, ELM provides a full 2-year warranty on all their products. Customers must initiate a warranty claim within two years of retail purchase and must ship the backpack to the company’s Rochelle warehouse so that it is received within two weeks of initiating the claim.
Customers pay the shipping on the warranty return, ELM pays the cost of shipping the product back, and that cost is included in the cost of the warranty claim.
Upon receipt of a claim, the claim is approved by either warranty manager, Eric Stolman or by production manager Melissa Peck. ELM establishes a sequential warranty claim number (CLAIMNO). If the customer has never returned a product under warranty before, ELM also assigns a sequential customer number specifically related to claims (CLAIMCUSTNO). The CLAIMNO is unique to a single claim, but the CLAIMCUSTNO is used for all claims filed by a single customer.
ELM repairs any backpacks where the total cost of the repair (including labor costs but excluding shipping) is less than the unit cost of a replacement backpack. If the cost of the repair is estimated to exceed the cost of replacing the backpack, a new product is shipped to the customer.
Type Product
NumberUnit Shipping
CostSchool Pack SP00 $ 12.50 Hiking Pack HB005 $ 15.50 Camping Pack CB008 $ 21.00 ELM has negotiated shipping rates with UPS and has a fixed packaging and shipping cost for returning products on warranty:
Because ELM prides itself on excellent customer service and product workmanship, the company recognizes warranty expense as 1% of total sales. Historically, this amount has been adequate. The company indicates that all three products have approximately equal warranty claims, but the School and Hiking packs are replaced significantly more than the Camping Pack because of the higher unit cost of a replacement unit. The company redesigned their packs during the 2020 fiscal year (during June, 2019), however the company does not expect warranty claims to change significantly. For the purposes of this case, you may assume that sales occurred uniformly throughout the year.You have access to the following data:
ELM Warranty Data file
The following is a data dictionary listing the column names, descriptions and field types in the Warranty Claim 2020 database.
Column Name Column description Field type CLAIMNO Warranty claim number Numeric CLAIMCUSTNO Customer Number, unique to claims Numeric CLAIMDATE Date the customer warranty claim was reported Date DD/MM/YYYY SALEDATE Date the customer purchased the product from the retail store/online Date DD/MM/YYYY RECDATE Date the returned backpack was received by ELM Date DD/MM/YYYY PRODNO Product Number Date DD/MM/YYYY REPLACE 1 if product is replaced, 0 if repaired Numeric WARRMAT Warranty materials cost Numeric (dollars) WARRLAB Warranty labor cost Numeric (dollars) FRGHTCOST Shipping Cost Numeric (dollars) RETDATE Date Product was returned to customer Date DD/MM/YYYY WARRAPP Initials of manager approving warranty repair Character You have been assigned to audit ELM Manufacturing Company’s Warranty Expense and Liability for the fiscal year end March 31, 2020. ELM has provided you with the following account reconciliation for Accrued Warranty Liability:
Beginning Balance, 4/1/19 $ 137,670 * Warranty Expense, fiscal 2020 156,475 Warranty Costs, fiscal 2020 (170,619 ) Ending Balance, 3/31/2020 $ 123,526 ** * Agreed to 3/31/19 audited financial statements
** Agreed to 3/31/20 unaudited General Ledger
Materiality for the warranty expense account is set at $50,000.
ELM has also provided you with their Warranty Claim 2020 database.
G.59
In assessing the completeness and accuracy of the information prepared by the entity, consider the following:
a. Is warranty expense of $156,475 calculated accurately based on the information provided and the client’s warranty policy?
multiple choice 1
Yes, Warranty expense accurately displays 1% of sales for the year.
No, Warranty expense does not match the costs incurred during the year.
b. Are the Warranty Costs in the reconciliation provided by the client mathematically accurate based on the Warranty Claim 2020 database?
multiple choice 2Yes, the total is $170,619.
No, the total is not $170,619.
- The final CLAIMNO filed during the year ended 3/31/19 was 36,454. Based on the client’s policy and use of sequential claim numbers, how many claim numbers are missing?
d. How many duplicate CLAIMNOswere recorded during the year? Count each pair of duplicate CLAIMNOs as 1.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!