Economic Impacts of the Russia Ukraine War
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Economic Impacts of the Russia Ukraine War
These are the readings we have done in the course. I am sending this to you to simply to help give you an idea of a good topic for an eventual 10-15 page page paper I will write from this research brief.
The correlates of war and the decision to rebel
Blattman C. and E. Miguel (2010) “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature, 48 (1): 3-57.
Week 2. The correlates of war (proximate causes): economic growth and income shocks
Miguel E., Satyanath S. and E. Sergenti (2004) “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An
Instrumental Variable Approach.” Journal of Political Economy, 112(4):725-753.Chassang, Sylvain and Gerard Padró i Miquel (2009). “Economic Shocks and Civil War”
Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4: 211-228.Week 3. The correlates of war (proximate causes): the rapacity effect
Dube, O. and J.F. Vargas (2016) “Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from
Colombia.” Review of Economic Studies, 80(4): 1384-1421.Nunn, N. and N. Qian (2014) “US Food Aid and Civil Conflict.” American Economic Review,
104(6): 1630-1666.Week 4. The correlates of war (proximate causes): ethnic conflict
Esteban, J., L. Mayoral and D. Ray (2012) “Ethnicity and Conflict: An Empirical Study.”
American Economic Review, 102(4): 1310-1342.Durante, R. and E. Zhuravskaya (2018) “Attack When the World Is Not Watching? US News
and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” Journal of Political Economy, 126(3): 1085-1133.Week 5. The individual decision to participate in war
Rogall, T. (2021) “Mobilizing the Masses for Genocide.” American Economic Review, 111(1):
41-72.Humpreys, M. and J.M. Weinstein (2008) “Who Fights? The Determinants of Civil War.”
American Journal of Political Science, 52(2): 436-455.Week 6. Counterinsurgency
Berman, E., J.H. Felter and J. N. Shapiro (2011) “Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The
Economics of Counterinsurgency in Iraq.” Journal of Political Economy, 119(4): 766-819.Lyall, J., G. Blair and K. Imai (2013) “Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A
Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review, 107(4): 679-705.Week 7. Natural Resources and War
Guidolin, M., and E. La Ferrara (2007) “Diamonds Are Forever, Wars Are Not: Is Conflict Bad
for Private Firms?” American Economic Review, 97 (5): 1978-1993.Berman, N., M. Couttenier, D. Rohner, and M. Thoenig. 2017. “This Mine Is Mine! How
Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa.” American Economic Review, 107 (6): 1564-1610.Week 8. Discussion of Research Briefs
Week 9. Yale Spring Break
II. The economic legacies of conflict
Justino, P. (2012) “War and Poverty” in The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Peace
and Conflict (eds. Garkfinkel M.R. and S. Skarpedas).Week 10. Human Capital: Education
León, G. (2012) “Civil Conflict and Human Capital Accumulation: The Long-Term Effects of
Political Violence in Perú.” Journal of Human Resources, 47(4): 991-1022.Valente, C. (2014) “Education and Civil Conflict in Nepal.” World Bank Economic Review,
28(2): 354-383.Week 11. Human Capital: Health
Camacho, A. (2008) “Stress and Birth Weight: Evidence from Terrorist Attacks.” American
Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 98(2): 511-515. + Verwimp, P. (2012)
“Undernutrition, Subsequent Risk of Mortality and Civil War in Burundi.” Economics and
Human Biology, 10: 221-231.Reynal-Querol, M. and J. G. Montalvo (2007) “Fighting against malaria: prevent wars while
waiting for the miraculous vaccines).” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (1): 165-177.Week 12. Local institutions: participation in organization and collective action
Bellows, J. and E. Miguel (2009) “War and Local Collective Action in Sierra Leone.” Journal
of Public Economics 93(11-12): 1144-1157.
Acemoglu, D., J.A. Robinson, and R. Santos (2013). “The Monopoly of Violence: Evidence
from Colombia.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(1): 5-44.Week 13. Aggregate Economic Consequences
Abadie A. and J. Gardeazabal (2003). “The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the
Basque Country.” American Economic Review, 93(1): 113-132.Besley, T. and H. Mueller (2012). “Estimating the Peace Dividend: The Impact of Violence
on House Prices in Ireland”, American Economic Review 102(2): 810-833.Week 14. IDP and Refugees
Altindag, O., O. Bakis and S. Rozo (2020). “Blessing or burden? Impacts of Refugees on
Businesses and the Informal Economy”, Journal of Development Economics, 146: 1-22.Engel, S. y A.M. Ibáñez (2007). “Displacement Due to Violence in Colombia: A Household
Level Analysis”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(2): 335-365.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!