ECON 138 Economics Workplace Discrimination Question
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ECON 138 Economics Workplace Discrimination Question
Econ 138 Writing Assignment 2: DUE October 30 by 6:30 PM PDT on Canvas. Please read all instructions both before you begin
the assignment and after you complete it. In this writing assignment, you will read and critically analyze an article from the San
Diego Union Tribune. Please explain your answers thoroughly and make sure you are caught up on all the lectures before
writing your essay! Steps: 1. Read the article, “Accountant applied for 80 jobs, promotions and got zero. Was it racism?.”
Summarize the article. What are two pieces of evidence that Kennedy gives to argue that there is racial discrimination within
the City of San Diego? 2. Suppose that Kennedy is right, and there is employment discrimination against Black employees for
the City of San Diego. Given the evidence in the article, do you think this is taste-based or statistical discrimination? Justify your
answer, using facts from the article. (Note, there is no correct answer! You can get full credit for arguing either tastebased or
statistical discrimination, as long as you justify your choice.) 3. Propose an experiment to test whether there is employment
discrimination against Black employees for the City of San Diego. Describe the experiment in detail, so that a person who hasn’t
taken Econ 138 could understand how the experiment works. What type of discrimination would your experiment be most
likely to uncover (statistical or tastebased)? Justify your argument. 4. The article states that in the City of San Diego, “employees
of color [make] 20.8 percent less than Whites.” While some of this gap is explained by different career choices, 12 percent
remains unexplained. However, the City of San Diego does not track employees’ education or performance review results.
Suppose that the city of San Diego begins to track performance reviews, and that performance reviews explain the remaining
pay gap. Suppose further that the City of San Diego says that this result shows there is no employment discrimination. Why
might you still think there could be employment discrimination? Explain. Format: You have 600 words. You need at least one
short paragraph per step. Write freely and then revise to express your ideas clearly and concisely. You do not need to write an
introduction or conclusion. You do not need to restate the questions I asked. Focus on the economics; I am not going to judge
the quality of your writing (so long as it is readable), but rather the quality of the economic thought behind them. You can write
in the first person, using “I” statements. To make it easier for graders to read, use Times New Roman 12 point font with double-
spaced lines. You must submit either a .doc or .pdf file. Please follow APA style when discussing different racial/ethnic groups.
Current APA style recommends using “Black people”, “Black Americans”, etc. , rather than “Blacks”. Use race/ethnicity in this
way as a descriptor rather than as a noun for all groups. Additionally, always capitalize Black, White, Hispanic, Asian, etc.
Grading: The graders will follow the below rubric. There is no partial credit within any of the subsections unless otherwise
stated. Late submissions will receive up to a 20 point (50% penalty). Step 1 [8 points] 4 pts: summarizes article 4 pts: two pieces
of evidence (2 points each) Step 2 [8 points] 8 points: coherent and logical argument (4 points if no reference) Step 3 [12 points]
8 pts: detailed experiment (4 points if decent attempt made)1 4 pts: type of discrimination + argument Step 4 [8 points] 8 pts:
coherent and logical argument (4 points if decent attempt made) Legibility [4 points] 2 pts: Stay within word count (500-700
words) 2 pts: Legibility points (double spaced, submitted as a .doc or .pdf, etc.) Academic Integrity: You are not permitted to
discuss this writing assignment with anyone: other students, private tutors, friends, family, etc. You are permitted to use other
written sources, but you need to cite them in the format of your choice (and you are discouraged against doing so; these
questions are not easily searched, and you will likely end up plagiarizing). Your writing assignment will be automatically
submitted to Turnitin when you submit it on Canvas. Anyone whose essay is similar to any written source or the essay of
another student will receive a zero grade and be reported for an Academic Integrity violation. Late Assignments: The
assignment closes at 6:30pm on Canvas. An assignment submitted late, even if it’s only one minute late, will receive a late
penalty. Late penalties are up to the grader’s discretion, and will be worth up to 20 points (50% of your grade). Regrading
Policy: The graders will leave comments on your essay explaining where and why you lost points. If you believe you lost points in
error, you can submit a regrade request to the current instructor (for assignment 2, email Prof. Rittenhouse at
krittenh@ucsd.edu) until November 12. In this request you need to state which step you think you deserve more points on and
why. By submitting a request, you agree to wager half of the lost points, such that if the grader denies your request she will take
those points off your essay. For example, if you lost 4 points on Step 3, and submit a regrade request that is rejected, you will
lose an additional 2 points on your essay. Given this penalty, you should only submit requests for grades that you are 1 This is
whether the grader thinks a decent attempt was made, not whether you think a decent attempt was made. You will not receive
partial credit for arguments that are unrelated to economics. confident were made in error. We will not tell you via email
whether you should submit a request