E.coli Microbiology Term Paper Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Sources: 3Subject: BiologyTopic: E.coli (microbiology)Paper details:
RESEARCH PAPER Dr. Rouse
1. The research paper will be a total of five (5) pages: a. Page one (1): Title/Cover page; b. Pages two – four (2-4): body of paper – body will be three (3) typed pages total; c. Page five (5)/ last page: Reference page
2. Page One (1): The Title/Cover page will be as follows: a. Title of paper centered on the page; b. In bottom, right-hand corner of title page: i. Your name; ii. Due date; iii. Class period; iv. Instructor’s name: Dr. Rouse
3. Pages two through four (2-4): The body of the paper begins on the second page and continues through page four (4). The body of the paper is actually three (3) typed pages.
4. Page five (5): The last page of the paper is the Reference page. The proper way to cite references is included. (May want to utilize: http://easybib.com/.)
5. Plagiarism will be rewarded a grade of “0”.
6. You must have at least three (3) references for the paper. Paraphrase and use in-text documentation. DO NOT use quotes.
7. Grammar and spelling will be checked.
8. Each research paper will count as a major test grade. 9. Double space and use only Times New Roman 12 font. Save as .doc to submit to Canvas.
10. Use only black ink.
11. Must include the following headings: “Introduction,” “Cause,” “Symptoms”, and “Treatments, cures, or prevention” of the condition.
12. Submit to Canvas under Modules-Assignments by 11:59 p.m. of due date. RESEARCH PAPER GRADING RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS POSSIBLE POINTS POINTS EARNED Introduction – Include statistics and general information about condition 10 Cause – Include information on the cause of the condition 20 Symptoms-
10 Treatments or cures- Include specific names of drugs or procedures. 10 Reference page- Use appropriate format for each entry and use parenthetical documentation in the body of the paper to refer to each of the three (3) sources. 10 Grammar and spelling. 20 Typed in proper format. Double spaced, Times New Roman 12 font. Save as .DOC 10 Title Page 5 Type subtitles- “Introduction, Cause, Symptoms, and Treatments, Cures and/or Prevention.” 5
PLAGIARISM “Plagiarism is the presentation of another writer’s ideas or words, as if they were your own, without acknowledging the source. Most students understand what plagiarism is and do their very best to avoid it. Even so, once you have researched your topic, it may be difficult to make the distinction between your own voice and the voices of those you’ve consulted. Plagiarism is receiving increased legal scrutiny with the onset of the Internet and other computer networks.
The author’s work belongs to him and taking it without permission or acknowledgement is stealing.” (Write for College.) Examples of plagiarism include: • Copying word for word without quotation marks or acknowledging the source. • Use of key phrases word for word without acknowledgement. • Paraphrasing without giving credit to the author. (Use in-text documentation.) Using an author’s idea without giving him credit. PARENTHETICAL DOCUMENTATION You must use in-text documentation whenever you: • Use an original idea from one of your sources, whether you quote or paraphrase it.
• Summarize original ideas from one of your sources. • Use factual information that is not common knowledge. • Quote directly from a source. (You must ALSO use quotation marks here.) In APA style ( 2010), source material is cited using a system that emphasizes the author and date of publication in its in-text citations. These in-text citations—used when source material is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized—point to full bibliographic citations located in the reference page at the end of the document.
Use of Authors’ Names In APA style, only the author’s last name is used in the document as a whole and within in-text citations in particular. If the author’s name is mentioned in the text Most often, an author’s last name appears in the text with the date of publication immediately following in parentheses: Bolles (2000) provides a practical, detailed approach to job hunting. If the author’s name is not mentioned in the text When the author’s name does not appear in the text itself, it appears in the parenthetical citation followed by a comma and the date of publication: Interactive fiction permits readers to move freely through a text and to participate in its authorship (Bolter, 2001).
Note: If you cite the same source a second time within a paragraph, the year of publication may be omitted. If there are two authors When a work has two authors, always cite both names every time the source is cited in the text: Katzenbach and Smith (1993) define a team as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable” (p. 45). If the authors’ names appear in the text itself, connect the names with the word and; however, if the authors’ names appear parenthetically, connect the names with an ampersand (&):
A team is defined as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable” (Katzenbach & Smith, 1993, p. 45). If there are three, four, or five authors When you cite for the first time a work with three, four, or five authors, cite all authors: Cogdill, Fanderclai, Kilborn, and Williams (2001) argue that “making backchannel overtly available for study would require making its presence and content visible and its content persist, affecting the nature of the backchannel and raising social and ethical issues” (p. 109). (Again, if the authors’ names appear parenthetically rather than in the text itself, connect the final two names with a comma and an ampersand). In all subsequent citations, include only the name of the first author followed by et al. (the abbreviation for the Latin phrase meaning “and others”):
Cogdill et al. (2001) assert that “backchannel is multithreaded, substantial, and governed by many social conventions” (p. 109). Again, if the authors’ names appear parenthetically rather than in the text itself, connect the final two names with a comma and an ampersand. If there are six or more authors If a work has six or more authors, cite the last name of the first author followed by et al. in all citations: Adkins et al. (2001) studied the use of collaborative technology during a multinational, civil-military exercise. If two authors have the same last name If a document includes sources by two authors with the same last name, include the first and middle initial of each author in all text citations: R. P. Allen (1994) and D. N. Allen (1998) have both studied the effects of email monitoring in the workplace.
If two or more sources are cited When citing two or more sources by different authors within the same citation, place the authors’ names in parentheses in alphabetical order, followed by the year of publication and separated by a semicolon: Hypertext significantly changes the process of information retrieval (Bolter 2001; Bush, 1945; Landow 1997). If no author is identified If no author is identified, use an abbreviated title instead, followed by the date. Use quotation marks around article or chapter titles, and underline book, periodical, brochure, and report titles: The use of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems has grown substantially over the past five years as companies attempt to adapt to customer needs and to improve their profitability (“Making CRM Work”).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!