Dwight: How Much Transparency Case
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Dwight: How Much Transparency Case
Dwight
How Much Transparency
Transparency in an organization can strengthen or improve the level of trust employees have with the leadership. It is up to leadership to determine what level of transparency is appropriate. That determination should be made based on the overall organizational culture, the nature of the organization, and the scenario in which transparency is needed (Merlo, Eisingerich, Auh, & Levstek, 2018). For example, during my deployment to Afghanistan in 2008, one of the commanders was suspended and subsequently relieved for an inappropriate relationship. This information was conveyed to the rest of the organization. However, the details were omitted. Personnel were told the commander had been suspended, but not why. Full transparency, in this case, would have only caused rumors amongst the 750 people in the organization. Furthermore, the investigation would take months. What if rumors of the commander’s guilt started to spread, but at the conclusion of the investigation, the commander was found innocent? That would be a problem. Therefore, leaders need to evaluate every situation to determine the level of transparency (Heimstädt, 2017). There are no one-size fits all.
Exerting Influence
There are a few different ways a leader can exert influence through transparency. One of those ways in during the interview process of a hiring action. Hiring managers routinely scrub resumes and have a basic idea of the candidate before the interview takes place. However, in almost every instance, there are some questions. Maybe it’s a gap in employment history or short period of employment at a particular company. Whatever the reason, there are questions. Leaders can exert influence during the interview process by being transparent about those concerns (Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016). The leader can ask questions and openly communicate those concerns to the candidate.
Of equal importance is how a leader can exert influence through transparency while coaching, teaching, and mentoring a troublesome or low performing employee. Most organizations have a process for dealing with poor performers. It typically involves verbal and written counseling and if things do not improve, termination of the employee. A leader can exert influence during these verbal and written counseling by openly communicating the employee’s shortfalls. More specifically by developing a plan for the employee to overcome the challenges and succeed (Schnackenberg & Tomlinson, 2016).While serving in the Army, I routinely used this method to correct poor performing soldiers. In almost every instance, I was thanked afterward for being so forthcoming and honest with my assessment. In some instances, employees may not know they are poor performers. The employees’ previous leaders may not have done their job and counseled the employee of the poor performance. Therefore, a good leader will use transparency as a tool to motivate employees to improve their performance.
References
Heimstädt, M. (2017, December). Openwashing: A decoupling perspective on organizational transparency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125(), 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.037
Merlo, O., Eisingerich, A., Auh, S., & Levstek, J. (2018). The benefits and implementation of performance transparency: The why and how of letting your customers ? see through? your business. Business Horizons, 61(1), 73-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.007
Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016, November). Organizational transparency: A new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder Relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784-1810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202
Marsheena
What transparency is about is hard to capture in just one sentence. It is about sharing all the information the receiver wants or needs, and not just the news that the sender is willing to share. It is about putting all the facts on the table, even when some of them are uncomfortable. (Berg, 2011) Transparency has advantages to the business; there are numerous occurrences where data requires anchoring. Any data that could accomplish more damage to the organization and the general population it backings would comprise occasions where straightforwardness is not a decent system. In an association that is in charge of keeping up classified data on the strength of the country’s veterans, the data made accessible to workers and the general population is available to predictable evaluation. In government worked therapeutic services offices, giving complete divulgence in full detail might be destructive to the patients. Full divulgence of how or where some appropriated subsidizes bolster capacities, may bring up issues that could incidentally hazard introduction of a gathering of patient’s health data. While this model, is speculation and may not be the best representation, this brings issues to light that straightforwardness may not generally be something to be thankful for all organizations consistently. The outcomes of an excessive amount of straightforwardness Building on existing exploration and my consultancy work, I’ve presumed that total straightforwardness in the present associations may diminish useful, proportional conduct between representatives. (De Cremer, 2016) Complete straightforwardness should convey certainties to the surface. The actualities are then expected to represent themselves. In any case, disregarded to stand, realities don’t make a culture that tries to comprehend why something occurred. Rather than making sense of why an error was made, you recognize what the oversight was and who made it.
References
Berg, O. (2011, July 5). 3 Reasons Why Organizations Need to Increase Transparency. Retrieved from https://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-collaboration/3-reasons-why-organizations-need-to-increase-transparency-011886.php
De Cremer, D. (2016, July 21). When Transparency Backfires, and How to Prevent It. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2016/07/when-transparency-backfires-and-how-to-prevent-it
Patel, N. (2014, October 9). Why A Transparent Culture Is Good For Business. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/3036794/why-a-transparent-culture-is-good-for-business
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!