Drug Prescribing: Ethical and Legal Consequences
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Drug Prescribing’s Ethical and Legal ConsequencesPrescriptions are one of the main responsibilities of an advanced practice nurse. To avoid potential prescribing errors, however, one must be cautious and deliberate in making decisions. Rosenthal and Burchum (2018) underline that the capacity to prescribe drugs is both a privilege and a burden. This is due to the fact that prescribing must be done with respect for the ethical and legal ramifications. In light of this, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the legal and ethical implications of prescribing in the context of the scenario, strategies for dealing with disclosure and non-disclosure in the context of the scenario, and strategies for guiding decision-making as well as the process of writing prescriptions and reducing medication errors.Implications for Ethics and LawThe assigned case features a 5-year-old patient who was given an adult dose rather than a dose that was appropriate for his age. The legal ramifications of this situation for the prescriber include civil action, criminal charges, and medical board discipline. A nurse practitioner can be sued for medical malpractice, according to Westrick and Jacob (2016), if their negligence causes patients to be injured. In order for the practitioner to be charged in court, gross carelessness must be demonstrated. The regulatory board’s action is another legal implication of the foregoing event. In such a case, the board is required to evaluate the matter and take appropriate measures, such as education, if it is determined that education can help to resolve the problem. This action is done only if the board determines that the minimum standards of care were not fulfilled when the errors occurred. The board may suspend or revoke the practitioner’s license if the event was particularly heinous. Patients’ confidence may be eroded, and patients may suffer harm or injury as a result of the aforementioned scenario’s ethical implications.Strategies for Dealing with Nondisclosure and DisclosureDespite the practitioner’s best efforts to provide the best possible care, unforeseen outcomes do occur. In light of this, complying with the State law on medication mistake disclosure is one of the solutions to resolve disclosure and non-disclosure in the scenario above. In Illinois, nurse practitioners are required by law to report prescription errors. In Illinois, for example, the Adverse Health Care Event Reporting Law (410 ILCS 522/10) was enacted in 2005 to make it easier to report prescription errors such the improper dose (Illinois General Assembly, 2020). This law, however, is not utilized to penalise anyone who disclose inaccuracies. The third option is to apply the ethical obligation to disclose, in which Joint Commission Standard RI.2.90 requires patients and their families to be told not just about the intended but also the unintended results of care and treatment (Kass & Rose, 2016). As a result, this norm may aid in the timely disclosure of errors to patients and their families in this situation.Decision-making strategies used by an Advanced Practice NurseThe employment of ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence is one of the tactics I would use to influence decision-making in the case above. These concepts usually imply that healthcare providers should do what is best for their patients while also avoiding harming them. This would assist in making the best decision and comprehending the potential risks and rewards of disclosure. According to Shaikh and Cohen (2020), disclosing a medication error has a significant impact on improving patient safety since appropriate actions can be done to prevent or limit adverse outcomes. Another method I would employ is to seek advice from physicians or other nurse practitioners on how to manage the aforementioned situation. This can ensure that the best interests of the patient, which in this situation is patient safety, are considered. Notifying the rest of the team would also aid in the better management of any undesirable outcomes and the prevention of mismanagement.Despite the fact that clinicians are constantly faced with the decision of whether or not to reveal prescription errors, Shaikh and Cohen (2020) propose that they always choose disclosure. This is because disclosure can help to reduce patient harm and improve safety. In the foregoing circumstance, I would inform the patients’ parents about the medication error to ensure that any potential harm is handled and that further adverse events are avoided.Prescription Writing Procedures and Medication Error Prevention TechniquesKey features should be mentioned in prescriptions, according to Rosenthal and Burchum (2018). The prescriber’s name, license number, contact information, DEA number, patient’s name and age, medicine name, strength, and frequency, as well as the number of refills are all included. Medication reconciliation, as well as the use of technology such as CPOE, which has been shown to reduce medication errors by 50%, are some of the tactics that can be utilized to reduce medication errors (Rosenthal & Burchum, 2018).ConclusionAs a result of the above debate, it has been shown that medication error is one of the most common errors in healthcare. However, it has been determined that healthcare providers are required to report drug errors under the law. This is primarily for the goal of improving the safety of patients..
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!