Domestic Terrorism Discussion

Domestic Terrorism Discussion

Description/Paper Instructions

Domestic Terrorism Discussion

I’m working on a social science discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Discuss one of the following:

• What are leftist violent movements?;
• What is the relationship between the radical left and Islamists?;
• What influence, if any, do you think that Horst Mahler may have on leftists in the United States?; or
• What are the differences between US and European leftists?
  

Virtual Communication in Personal and Professional Deals Discussion

Discussion: Virtual Communication—What Works?

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly everyone had to adjust quickly to conducting most communication virtually, both personally and professionally. Sometimes these communications worked well; other times, they went awry or were simply ineffective. For this Discussion, you will reflect on your experience with both effective and ineffective virtual communication to help determine best practices.

To prepare for this Discussion:

• Think about both the personal and professional virtual communication you have had recently. Choose one or two interactions that were effective and one or two that were not. For each, consider specific factors that led to the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the virtual communication in meeting its intended purpose. 

BY DAY 3

Post an analysis of the effectiveness of virtual communication. In your analysis, do the following:

• Briefly describe one or two effective virtual communication situations and one or two that were ineffective, providing the context and purpose of each.
• For each of your examples, analyze at least two distinct factors that contributed to its effectiveness/ineffectiveness in meeting its intended purpose.
• For each of your examples, analyze the effect of the interaction on the overall outcome and relationship (if applicable).
• Based on these experiences, propose a suggested list of 3–5 best practices for effective virtual communication. 

Refer to the Week 3 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.

Read some of your colleagues’ postings.

BY DAY 5

Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ posts in one or more of the following ways:

• Compare and contrast both the success factors and difficulties encountered by your colleague with those you described.
• Describe how you can use at least one of your colleague’s recommended best practices to ensure more effective virtual communication in the future.
• Provide one or two additional best practices that might have helped in your colleague’s ineffective virtual communication situation(s).

Reply:

Kweshonte Mathews

RE: Discussion – Week 3 Templates

COLLAPSE

Briefly describe one or two effective virtual communication situations and one or two that were ineffective, providing the context and purpose of each.

Being proactive with virtual communication is vital in these times. More communication is required. A couple of things I have learned with virtually communicating is starting off a meeting by displaying empathy. It shows that you want to make a connection before conducting business, sometimes, that is what makes people comfortable in their decision-making. A way to make a connection with that person is by asking them to show they are doing, or how their family is doing.

An ineffective virtual communication I have learned is inviting distractions. Asking them to turn down their music, open and close the app, etc. Asking these things can cause a delay in the initial meeting. You may lose time, the person may lose interest, things may get miscommunicated because you feel rushed (Salter, et al., 2010). Those things should be addressed in an email before the meeting date and time.

For each of your examples, analyze at least two distinct factors that contributed to its effectiveness/ineffectiveness in meeting its intended purpose.

After analyzing my examples on virtual communication, there were two distinct factors that contributed to both the effectiveness and ineffectiveness of communicating. For ineffective communication, I noticed that inviting distractions can cause complications in communications and for effective virtual communication we want to be mindful of making that human connection before conducting business.

For each of your examples, analyze the effect of the interaction on the overall outcome and relationship (if applicable).

Sometimes with business, you want to be relatable. With face-to-face meetings, we speak beyond words (Salter, et al., 2010). We pick up on messages by observing body language and facial expressions. Virtually, that can be difficult at times considering any unforeseen issue. Showing empathy through concern and support for others makes the meeting more comfortable for both parties. Relationships are the key to healthy and successful communication.

Regardless of what meeting you are in or how long or short your meetings are, distractions are all around us. Distractions can cause miscommunications or a misunderstanding. Limiting distractions shows that your undivided attention is front and center. You care to be there, involved, and engaged.

Based on these experiences, propose a suggested list of 3–5 best practices for effective virtual communication.

1. Have a communication plan
2. Ask if there is anything they would like to cover or go over in the meeting
3. Conduct follow-ups
4. Communicate clearly
5. Be prepared and organized

Domestic Terrorism Discussion

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!