Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Topic: Does whisper of gibbons show evolution in speech
Paper details:write a 6-8 literature review paper that follows these guidelines: Review papers do not have a standardized format in the same way research papers do (example: no methods or results sections). Instead, you should follow these guidelines:
The first few paragraphs should provide an introduction and background on your topic.
The body of your paper should include a synthesis of information from your readings. Use subheadings for different areas, but it should not be organized source by source.The last few paragraphs should serve a conclusion where you summarize the ideas discussed in your paper and explain their broader importance. Direct quotes are rarely used in formal scientific writing. You may not use direct quotes in your review paper. You must explain the information in your own words.
formatting the citations for six articles in the style of the Journal of Evolutionary Biology (J Evol Biol). Make sure there is a thorough, critical review of the literature you compile as well as a cohesive synthesis of this literature in the review paper. Your completed paper will be 6 – 8 pages double-spaced text and will also include a properly formatted works cited list.
Font: Times New Roman
Double-spaced (Set line spacing to 2.0)
12-point font size
1-inch margins on all sidesMake sure there is Accuracy/thoroughness of literature summary, Ability to make connections to concepts covered in evolution class, Demonstration of critical thinking and creativity when describing future experiments, and Quality of writing. Make sure
The opening paragraphs provide a:
Thorough background of the system studied
Rationale for this type of study
Central question/objectives
The closing paragraphs discuss:
(or these may be addressed throughout the paper)Controversies/disagreement among sources, or identification of weaknesses/problem of a source
Broader implications of the paper’s findings
(What does it all mean to the big picture?)
Ideas for future research – want to hear your suggestions, not those of the authors
Literature is explained in detail, demonstrating comprehension of the source material
Information from different sources is synthesized to address paper objectives; connections are made across sources rather than providing separate summariesDemonstrate knowledge gained from evolution class in interpreting the research question and make connections to evolution material
All sources are cited in text and as citations
At least 6 total sources; at least 4 primary sources
Citations are complete and have a consistent style
similar to Journal of Evolutionary BiologyFree of spelling errors
Free of grammar errors
Free of incomplete or run-on sentences
Each paragraph contains a topic sentence; additional sentences provide support for the main theme
Logical flow to the order of paragraphs and the sequence in which material is presented
The works cited list is in the materials section named works cited evolutionary page.docxThe research articles to use in the paper is named whisper gibbons 3rd paper, whisper gibbons 4th paper, whisper gibbons 5th paper, whisper gibbons 6th paper, Clarke_E._-_The_anti-predator behavior, and
the syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs.
Make sure The 6-8 paper should be in apa format but works cited should be in journal of evolutionary biology.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!